Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  JESTCOV v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA AND RUSSIA

  No violation of Article 2 - Right to life (Article 2-1 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect) (Russia);Violation of Article 2 - Right to life (Article 2-1 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect) (the Republic of Moldova) ...

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  JESTCOV v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA AND RUSSIA

  Art. 2, Art. 2 Abs. 1 MRK
  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ...Zitiert selbst (5)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 26.05.2020 - 17247/13

  MAKUCHYAN AND MINASYAN v. HUNGARY AND AZERBAIJAN

  Auszug aus EGMR, 28.09.2021 - 33567/15

  The Court reiterates that the enforcement of a sentence imposed in the context of the right to life must be regarded as an integral part of the State's procedural obligation under Article 2 (see, mutatis mutandis, Kitanovska Stanojkovic and Others v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, no. 2319/14, §§ 32-33, 13 October 2016; Akelienė v. Lithuania, no. 54917/13, § 85, 16 October 2018; Makuchyan and Minasyan v. Azerbaijan and Hungary, no. 17247/13, § 50, 26 May 2020).
• EGMR, 24.01.2012 - 44746/08

  BALAN v. MOLDOVA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 28.09.2021 - 33567/15

  The Court notes that it has already considered this remedy and found it to be effective in respect of the non-enforcement of civil judgments (see Balan v. Moldova (dec.), no. 44746/08, 24 January 2012, and Manascurta v. Moldova (dec.), no. 31856/07, 14 February 2012).
• EGMR, 14.02.2012 - 31856/07

  MANASCURTA v. MOLDOVA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 28.09.2021 - 33567/15

  The Court notes that it has already considered this remedy and found it to be effective in respect of the non-enforcement of civil judgments (see Balan v. Moldova (dec.), no. 44746/08, 24 January 2012, and Manascurta v. Moldova (dec.), no. 31856/07, 14 February 2012).
• EGMR, 16.10.2018 - 54917/13

  AKELIENÄ- v. LITHUANIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 28.09.2021 - 33567/15

  The Court reiterates that the enforcement of a sentence imposed in the context of the right to life must be regarded as an integral part of the State's procedural obligation under Article 2 (see, mutatis mutandis, Kitanovska Stanojkovic and Others v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, no. 2319/14, §§ 32-33, 13 October 2016; Akelienė v. Lithuania, no. 54917/13, § 85, 16 October 2018; Makuchyan and Minasyan v. Azerbaijan and Hungary, no. 17247/13, § 50, 26 May 2020).
• EGMR, 29.09.2015 - 61946/12

  ZOLTAI v. HUNGARY AND IRELAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 28.09.2021 - 33567/15

  On the facts of the case, the Court considers that the Moldovan authorities did not display the requisite diligence in seeking the enforcement of the custodial sentence in respect of N.C. (see, a contrario, Zoltai v. Hungary and Ireland, (dec.), no. 61946/12, 29 September 2015).

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 18.01.2022 - 68490/14

  NATALIA LUNGU c. RÉPUBLIQUE DE MOLDOVA

  La Cour juge que ces manquements des autorités moldaves à faire exécuter les peines de A.C. et N.G. n'étaient pas conformes aux obligations positives incombant à l'État défendeur en vertu de l'article 2 de la Convention (comparer avec Jestcov c. République de Moldova et Russie [comité], no 33567/15, § 32, 28 septembre 2021, et voir, a contrario, Akeliene c. Lithuanie, no 54917/13, §§ 91-93, 16 octobre 2018).