Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  TRAN v. NORWAY

  Art. 8 MRK
  Inadmissible (englisch)

Wird zitiert von ...Zitiert selbst (3)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 10.04.2006 - 14474/03

  COMERT v. DENMARK

  Auszug aus EGMR, 14.06.2007 - 34029/05

  However, the duration of the prison sentence at issue does not mean that his expulsion was not founded on important public order interests of the Contracting State (see, for instance, Boughanemi v. France, judgment of 24 April 1996, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996-II; Nwosu v. Denmark (dec.) no. 50359/99, 10 July 2001; Lagergren v. Denmark (dec.) no. 18668/03, 16 October 2006; Cömert v. Denmark (dec.) no. 14474/03, 10 April 2006).
• EGMR, 16.10.2006 - 18668/03

  LAGERGREN v. DENMARK

  Auszug aus EGMR, 14.06.2007 - 34029/05

  However, the duration of the prison sentence at issue does not mean that his expulsion was not founded on important public order interests of the Contracting State (see, for instance, Boughanemi v. France, judgment of 24 April 1996, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996-II; Nwosu v. Denmark (dec.) no. 50359/99, 10 July 2001; Lagergren v. Denmark (dec.) no. 18668/03, 16 October 2006; Cömert v. Denmark (dec.) no. 14474/03, 10 April 2006).
• EGMR, 10.07.2001 - 50359/99

  NWOSU v. DENMARK

  Auszug aus EGMR, 14.06.2007 - 34029/05

  However, the duration of the prison sentence at issue does not mean that his expulsion was not founded on important public order interests of the Contracting State (see, for instance, Boughanemi v. France, judgment of 24 April 1996, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996-II; Nwosu v. Denmark (dec.) no. 50359/99, 10 July 2001; Lagergren v. Denmark (dec.) no. 18668/03, 16 October 2006; Cömert v. Denmark (dec.) no. 14474/03, 10 April 2006).

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 11.04.2023 - 57766/19

  LOUKILI v. THE NETHERLANDS

  Thus, the fact that a convicted long-term settled migrant may be said to have been given one or more relatively lenient prison sentences - a combined one year and four months' imprisonment in the applicant's case - does not preclude a finding that an expulsion is, or would be, founded on important public order interests of the Contracting State (see, mutatis mutandis, Boughanemi v. France, 24 April 1996, Reports 1996-II; Lagergren v. Denmark (dec.), no. 18668/03, 16 October 2006; and Tran v. Norway (dec.), no. 34029/05, 14 June 2007).