Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  RAMBIERT v. POLAND

  Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 3 MRK
  No violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-3 - Length of pre-trial detention) (englisch)

Wird zitiert von ...Zitiert selbst (4)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 26.10.2000 - 30210/96

  Ableitung einer allgemeinen Verpflichtung zur Entlassung eines …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 10.03.2015 - 34322/10

  The Court recalls that the general principles regarding the right to trial within a reasonable time or to release pending trial, as guaranteed by Article 5 § 3 of the Convention were stated in a number of its previous judgments (see, among many other authorities, Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, § 110 et seq, ECHR 2000-XI; and McKay v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 543/03, §§ 41-44, ECHR 2006-..., with further references).
• EGMR, 04.05.2006 - 17584/04

  CELEJEWSKI v. POLAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 10.03.2015 - 34322/10

  The relevant domestic law and practice concerning the imposition of detention on remand (aresztowanie tymczasowe), the grounds for its prolongation, release from detention and rules governing other, so-called "preventive measures" (srodki zapobiegawcze) are stated in the Court's judgments in the cases of Golek v. Poland, no. 31330/02, §§ 27-33, 25 April 2006 and Celejewski v. Poland, no. 17584/04, §§ 22-23, 4 August 2006.
• EGMR, 16.01.2007 - 7870/04

  BAK v. POLAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 10.03.2015 - 34322/10

  In the Court's view, the fact that the case concerned a member of such a criminal group should be taken into account in assessing compliance with Article 5 § 3 (see Bak v. Poland, no. 7870/04, § 57, 16 January 2007).
• EGMR, 04.10.2005 - 28904/02

  GORSKI v. POLAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 10.03.2015 - 34322/10

  The Court reiterates that the existence of a general risk flowing from the organised nature of the alleged criminal activities of the applicant may be accepted as the basis for his detention at the initial stages of the proceedings (see Górski v. Poland, no. 28904/02, § 58, 4 October 2005) and in some circumstances also for subsequent prolongations of the detention (see Celejewski, cited above, § 37).

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 21.04.2020 - 28085/16

  ANDRUSZKIEWICZ AND FLUDERSKI v. POLAND

  Also, the need to obtain voluminous evidence and to determine the degree of the alleged responsibility of each of the defendants, who had allegedly acted as a criminal group and against whom numerous charges of serious offences were laid, constituted valid grounds for the applicants' initial detention (see, mutatis mutandis, Mierzejewski v. Poland, no. 15612/13, § 38, 24 February 2015, Rambiert v. Poland, no. 34322/10, § 31, 10 March 2015; and Wrona v. Poland, no. 29345/09, § 35, 10 March 2015).