Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 29.01.2008 - 34418/04 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2008,62324) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
CSOSZ v. HUNGARY
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1 MRK
Violation of Art. 6-1 No violation of Art. 6-1 (englisch)
Wird zitiert von ... Neu Zitiert selbst (2)
- EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 30979/96
FRYDLENDER c. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 29.01.2008 - 34418/04
The Court reiterates that the reasonableness of the length of proceedings must be assessed in the light of the circumstances of the case and with reference to the following criteria: the complexity of the case, the conduct of the applicant and the relevant authorities and what was at stake for the applicant in the dispute (see, among many other authorities, Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII). - EGMR, 13.02.2003 - 49636/99
CHEVROL c. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 29.01.2008 - 34418/04
Considering the proceedings as a whole, the Court is satisfied that the domestic courts reached their conclusions in adversarial proceedings, without attributing exclusive importance to a single piece of evidence not susceptible to challenge (compare and contrast Chevrol v. France, no. 49636/99, §§ 81-82, ECHR 2003-III).
- EGMR, 03.05.2016 - 7183/11
LETINCIC v. CROATIA
In this connection the Court reiterates that Article 6 § 1 of the Convention does not bar the national courts from relying on expert opinions drawn up by specialised bodies to resolve the disputes before them when this is required by the nature of the contentious issues under consideration (see Csösz v. Hungary, no. 34418/04, § 34, 29 January 2008, and Fazliyski v. Bulgaria, no. 40908/05, § 59, 16 April 2013).