Having examined all the material submitted to it and having regard to its case-law on the subject (see Zolger v. Slovenia, no. 75688/01, §§ 17-19, 30 March 2006; Puz v. Slovenia, no. 76199/01, §§ 20-22, 30 March 2006; Cekuta v. Slovenia, no. 77796/01, §§ 19-21, 6 April 2006; and Bitenc v. Slovenia, no. 3474/06, §§ 38-42, 30 January 2014), the Court, for the reasons set out above, considers that in the instant case the overall length of the proceedings has been excessive and has failed to meet the "reasonable time" requirement.

Having regard to the foregoing and to its case-law on the subject (see Zolger v. Slovenia, no. 75688/01, §§ 17-19, 30 March 2006; Puz v. Slovenia, no. 76199/01, §§ 20-22, 30 March 2006; Cekuta v. Slovenia, no. 77796/01, §§ 19-21, 6 April 2006; and Bitenc v. Slovenia, no. 3474/06, §§ 38-42, 30 January 2014), the Court considers that in the instant case the length of the proceedings was excessive and failed to meet the "reasonable time" requirement.