Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  A.Y. v. SLOVAKIA

  Inadmissible (englisch)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  A.Y. v. SLOVAKIA

  Art. 3, Art. 13 MRK
  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (2)Zitiert selbst (7)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 14.09.2010 - 21022/08

  [ENG]

  Auszug aus EGMR, 01.03.2016 - 37146/12

  Moreover, they referred to the case-law of the Court, including its decision of 14 September 2010 in the cases of Chentiev v. Slovakia and Ibragimov v. Slovakia (nos. 21022/08 and 51946/08).

  As to the guarantees under assessment in the present case, the Court notes that they are similar in nature to those accepted by the Court in Chentiev (cited above) and Ibragimov (cited above, no. 51946/08 and, recently, no. 65916/10).

• EGMR, 07.07.1989 - 14038/88

  Jens Söring

  Auszug aus EGMR, 01.03.2016 - 37146/12

  The Court has earlier admitted that an issue might exceptionally be raised under Article 6 by an extradition decision in circumstances where the fugitive suffered or risked suffering a flagrant denial of a fair trial in the requesting country (see, for example, Soering v. the United Kingdom, 7 July 1989, § 121, Series A no. 161; Mamatkulov and Askarov v. Turkey [GC], nos. 46827/99 and 46951/99, §§ 90-91, ECHR 2005-I; or Othman (Abu Qatada), cited above, § 258).
• EGMR, 27.04.1988 - 9659/82

  Auszug aus EGMR, 01.03.2016 - 37146/12

  For similar reasons, it may not be considered "arguable" for the purposes of Article 13 of the Convention (see Boyle and Rice v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 27 April 1988, Series A no. 131, § 52).

• EGMR, 27.02.2014 - 35/10

  ZARMAYEV c. BELGIQUE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 01.03.2016 - 37146/12

  In a further reply, the respondent Government pointed out that they had recently obtained an amendment and confirmation of the guarantees provided by the OPGRF (see paragraphs 29 and 30 above) and referred to the Court's decision in Ibragimov v. Slovakia (no. 65916/10, 30 June 2015) and judgments in the cases of Chankayev, (cited above); Zarmayev v. Belgium (no. 35/10, 27 February 2014); and Tershiyev v. Azerbaijan (no. 10226/13, 31 July 2014), in which no violation of Article 3 was found in the context of those applicants' extradition to the Russian Federation.
• EGMR, 14.11.2013 - 56688/12

  CHANKAYEV v. AZERBAIJAN

  Auszug aus EGMR, 01.03.2016 - 37146/12

  A number of relevant international instruments and reports concerning the situation in Russia are summarised, for example, in the Court's judgments in the cases of M.G. v. Bulgaria (no. 59297/12, §§ 39-58, 25 March 2014), and Chankayev v. Azerbaijan (no. 56688/12, §§ 44-52, 14 November 2013, with further references).
• EGMR, 31.07.2014 - 10226/13

  TERSHIYEV v. AZERBAIJAN

  Auszug aus EGMR, 01.03.2016 - 37146/12

  In a further reply, the respondent Government pointed out that they had recently obtained an amendment and confirmation of the guarantees provided by the OPGRF (see paragraphs 29 and 30 above) and referred to the Court's decision in Ibragimov v. Slovakia (no. 65916/10, 30 June 2015) and judgments in the cases of Chankayev, (cited above); Zarmayev v. Belgium (no. 35/10, 27 February 2014); and Tershiyev v. Azerbaijan (no. 10226/13, 31 July 2014), in which no violation of Article 3 was found in the context of those applicants' extradition to the Russian Federation.
• EGMR - 30444/08 (anhängig)

  [ENG]

  Auszug aus EGMR, 01.03.2016 - 37146/12

  Messrs Tsurov, Ozdoyev and Khadziyev introduced an application of their own under Article 34 of the Convention against the Russian Federation (no. 30444/08).

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 09.07.2019 - 3598/10

  KISLOV v. RUSSIA

  no. 37146/12, §§ 14, 28-29 and 56-65, 1 March 2016), in view of the foregoing findings that his substantive allegations are unfounded, the absence of relevant assurances does not change the outcome of the complaint under Article 3 of the Convention.
• EGMR, 29.01.2019 - 47679/17

  M.I. v. BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA

  With respect to the alleged risk of the applicant's being ill-treated in the event of his extradition, the Court notes that, as experience shows, the physical abuse of suspects by police officers usually occurs within the first few days of an arrest (see, for example, Tershiyev v. Azerbaijan, no. 10226/13, § 53, 31 July 2014, and A.Y. v. Slovakia (dec.), no. 37146/12, § 58, 1 March 2016), which is a different type of situation from that now potentially faced by the applicant.