Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  CHKHIKVISHVILI v. RUSSIA

  Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-4 - Review of lawfulness of detention);No violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention;Article 5-1-f - Expulsion) ...

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  CHKHIKVISHVILI v. RUSSIA

  Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 1 Buchst. f, Art. 5 Abs. 4 MRK
  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (6)Zitiert selbst (6)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 15.10.2015 - 40081/14

  Russland verurteilt - Keine Zwangsausweisung nach Syrien

  Auszug aus EGMR, 25.10.2016 - 43348/13

  40081/14, 40088/14 and 40127/14, §§ 140-42, 15 October 2015; Rakhimov v. Russia, no. 50552/13, §§ 148-50, 10 July 2014; Akram Karimov v. Russia, no. 62892/12, §§ 199-204, 28 May 2014; Egamberdiyev v. Russia, no. 34742/13, § 64, 26 June 2014; and Azimov v. Russia, no. 67474/11, § 153, 18 April 2013).
• EGMR, 18.04.2013 - 67474/11

  AZIMOV v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 25.10.2016 - 43348/13

  40081/14, 40088/14 and 40127/14, §§ 140-42, 15 October 2015; Rakhimov v. Russia, no. 50552/13, §§ 148-50, 10 July 2014; Akram Karimov v. Russia, no. 62892/12, §§ 199-204, 28 May 2014; Egamberdiyev v. Russia, no. 34742/13, § 64, 26 June 2014; and Azimov v. Russia, no. 67474/11, § 153, 18 April 2013).
• EGMR, 17.07.2014 - 44260/13

  KIM v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 25.10.2016 - 43348/13

  The Court will consider firstly whether there was effective judicial supervision over the lawfulness of the applicant's detention, as required by Article 5 § 4 of the Convention, and secondly whether it was compatible with the requirements of Article 5 § 1 (f) of the Convention (see Kim v. Russia, no. 44260/13, § 38, 17 July 2014, with further references).

• EGMR, 28.05.2014 - 62892/12

  AKRAM KARIMOV v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 25.10.2016 - 43348/13

  40081/14, 40088/14 and 40127/14, §§ 140-42, 15 October 2015; Rakhimov v. Russia, no. 50552/13, §§ 148-50, 10 July 2014; Akram Karimov v. Russia, no. 62892/12, §§ 199-204, 28 May 2014; Egamberdiyev v. Russia, no. 34742/13, § 64, 26 June 2014; and Azimov v. Russia, no. 67474/11, § 153, 18 April 2013).
• EGMR, 10.07.2014 - 50552/13

  RAKHIMOV v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 25.10.2016 - 43348/13

  40081/14, 40088/14 and 40127/14, §§ 140-42, 15 October 2015; Rakhimov v. Russia, no. 50552/13, §§ 148-50, 10 July 2014; Akram Karimov v. Russia, no. 62892/12, §§ 199-204, 28 May 2014; Egamberdiyev v. Russia, no. 34742/13, § 64, 26 June 2014; and Azimov v. Russia, no. 67474/11, § 153, 18 April 2013).
• EGMR, 26.06.2014 - 34742/13

  EGAMBERDIYEV v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 25.10.2016 - 43348/13

  40081/14, 40088/14 and 40127/14, §§ 140-42, 15 October 2015; Rakhimov v. Russia, no. 50552/13, §§ 148-50, 10 July 2014; Akram Karimov v. Russia, no. 62892/12, §§ 199-204, 28 May 2014; Egamberdiyev v. Russia, no. 34742/13, § 64, 26 June 2014; and Azimov v. Russia, no. 67474/11, § 153, 18 April 2013).

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 14.02.2017 - 52722/15

  Asyl: Russland darf Syrer nicht abschieben

  The Court previously found violations of Article 5 § 1 of the Convention on account of the same statutory framework for detention of foreigners with a view to administrative removal (see Azimov, §§ 160-174; Kim, §§ 46-57; and L.M. and Others v. Russia, §§ 147-52, all cited above; R. v. Russia, no. 11916/15, §§ 103-107, 26 January 2016; compare Chkhikvishvili v. Russia, no. 43348/13, §§ 30-32, 25 October 2016).
• EGMR, 21.05.2019 - 17833/16

  A.S. c. RUSSIE

  From the outset the Court observes that the review proceedings conducted by the Oktyabrskiy District Court of Izhevsk upon the bailiff's request to postpone the enforcement of the removal order (see paragraph 14 above), did not satisfy the requirements of Article 5 § 4. Although the court may examine a complaint against an official act or omission and declare unlawful a delay in the removal proceeding, it may not order the detainee's release or set a time-limit for his or her detention (see paragraph 23 above and also Chkhikvishvili v. Russia, no. 43348/13, §§ 17 and 27, 25 October 2016).
• EGMR, 15.05.2018 - 11556/17

  MAINOV v. RUSSIA

  The authorities had not asked him to specify such a country or taken any steps to explore that option on their own initiative (contrast with Chkhikvishvili v. Russia, no. 43348/13, § 30, 25 October 2016).

• EGMR, 29.01.2019 - 23019/15

  ALIMURADOV v. RUSSIA

  The proceedings under Chapter 25 of the Code of Civil Procedure do not satisfy the requirements of Article 5 § 4 because, although a civil court may declare unlawful a delay in the removal proceedings, it may not order the detainee's release or set a time-limit for his or her detention (see Chkhikvishvili v. Russia, no. 43348/13, §§ 17 and 27, 25 October 2016).
• EGMR, 29.01.2019 - 8279/16

  MARDONSHOYEV v. RUSSIA

  The authorities had not asked him to specify such a country or taken any steps to explore that option on their own initiative (contrast Chkhikvishvili v. Russia, no. 43348/13, § 30, 25 October 2016).
• EGMR, 28.11.2017 - 55080/12

  CHANTURIDZE v. RUSSIA

  The proceedings under Chapter 25 of the Code of Civil Procedure do not satisfy the requirements of Article 5 § 4 because, although a civil court may declare unlawful a delay in the removal proceedings, it may not order the detainee's release or set a time-limit for his or her detention (see Chkhikvishvili v. Russia, no. 43348/13, §§ 17 and 27, 25 October 2016).