Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  SINNARAJAH contre la SUISSE

  Art. 2, Art. 2 Abs. 1, Art. 3 MRK
  Irrecevable (französisch)

Wird zitiert von ... (12)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 18.06.2009 - 20198/05

  MOLLAZEINAL v. CYPRUS

  270-71, §§ 75-78; and Sinnarajah v. Switzerland (dec.), no. 45187/99, 11 May 1999).
• EGMR, 22.06.2004 - 17341/03

  F. v. the UNITED KINGDOM

  Moreover, the Court does not exclude that analogous considerations might apply to Article 2 of the Convention where the return of an alien puts his or her life in danger, as a result of the imposition of the death penalty or otherwise (see e.g., Bahaddar v. the Netherlands, judgment of 19 February 1998, Reports 1998-I, opinion of the Commission, pp. 270-71, §§ 75-78; Sinnarajah v. Switzerland (dec.), no. 45187/99, 11 May 1999, unpublished; and Razaghi v. Sweden, (dec.) no. 64599/01, 11 March 2003).
• EGMR, 27.03.2008 - 37913/05

  HAKIZIMANA v. SWEDEN

  Moreover, the Court does not exclude that analogous considerations might apply to Article 2 of the Convention and to Article 1 of Protocol No. 13 where the return of an alien puts his or her life in danger, as a result of the imposition of the death penalty or otherwise (see, among other authorities, Bahaddar v. the Netherlands judgment of 19 February 1998, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998-I, opinion of the Commission, p. 270-71, §§ 75-78, and Sinnarajah v. Switzerland (dec.), no. 45187/99, 11 May 1999, unpublished).

• EGMR, 07.11.2006 - 4701/05

  AYEGH v. SWEDEN

  Moreover, the Court does not exclude that analogous considerations might apply to Article 2 of the Convention and to Article 1 of Protocol No. 13 where the return of an alien puts his or her life in danger, as a result of the imposition of the death penalty or otherwise (see, e.g., Bahaddar v. the Netherlands judgment of 19 February 1998, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998-I, opinion of the Commission, p. 270-71, §§ 75-78, and Sinnarajah v. Switzerland (dec.), no. 45187/99, 11 May 1999, unpublished).
• EGMR, 07.02.2006 - 34566/04

  GOMES v. SWEDEN

  Moreover, the Court does not exclude that analogous considerations might apply to Article 2 of the Convention and to Article 1 of Protocol No. 13 where the return of an alien puts his or her life in danger, as a result of the imposition of the death penalty or otherwise (see, e.g., Bahaddar v. the Netherlands judgment of 19 February 1998, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998-I, opinion of the Commission, p. 270-71, §§ 75-78, and Sinnarajah v. Switzerland (dec.), no. 45187/99, 11 May 1999, unpublished).
• EGMR, 23.03.2010 - 32971/08

  AYATOLLAHI AND HOSSEINZADEH v. TURKEY

  270-71, §§ 75-78; Sinnarajah v. Switzerland (dec.), no. 45187/99, 11 May 1999).
• EGMR, 13.12.2005 - 11682/04

  DEJBAKHSH AND MAHMOUD ZADEH v. SWEDEN

  Moreover, the Court does not exclude that analogous considerations might apply to Article 2 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 13 to the Convention where the return of an alien puts his or her life in danger, as a result of the imposition of the death penalty or otherwise (see, e.g., Bahaddar v. the Netherlands judgment of 19 February 1998, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998-I, opinion of the Commission, p. 270-71, §§ 75-78, and Sinnarajah v. Switzerland (dec.), no. 45187/99, 11 May 1999, unpublished).
• EGMR, 01.03.2005 - 39642/03

  HEADLEY AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  However, expulsion by a Contracting State of an alien may give rise to an issue under Article 2 of the Convention, and hence engage the responsibility of that State under the Convention, where substantial grounds have been shown for believing that the person in question, if expelled, would face a real risk of being killed (see, mutatis mutandis, the H.L.R. v. France judgment of 29 April 1997, Reports 1997-III, §§ 33-34; Sinnarajah v. Switzerland (dec.), no. 45187/99, 11 May 1999, unpublished; and Razaghi v. Sweden, (dec.) no. 64599/01, 11 March 2003).
• EGMR, 26.10.2004 - 16578/03

  B. v. SWEDEN

  Moreover, the Court does not exclude that analogous considerations might apply to Article 2 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 6 to the Convention where the return of an alien puts his or her life in danger, as a result of the imposition of the death penalty or otherwise (see, e.g., Bahaddar v. the Netherlands, judgment of 19 February 1998, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998-I, opinion of the Commission, p. 270-71, §§ 75-78, and Sinnarajah v. Switzerland (dec.), no. 45187/99, 11 May 1999, unreported).
• EGMR, 02.09.2008 - 8594/04

  A.A. v. SWEDEN

  Similar considerations may apply to Article 2 of the Convention where the return of an alien puts his or her life in danger, as a result of the imposition of the death penalty or for other reasons (see, inter alia, Bahaddar v. the Netherlands judgment of 19 February 1998, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998-I, opinion of the Commission, p. 270-71, §§ 75-78; and Sinnarajah v. Switzerland (dec.), no. 45187/99, 11 May 1999).
• EGMR, 23.04.2002 - 62806/00

  S.R. v. SWEDEN
• EGMR, 17.01.2006 - 32213/04

  BELLO v. SWEDEN