Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 08.04.2014 - 47509/13 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2014,22317) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
J.M. v. SWEDEN
Wird zitiert von ... Neu Zitiert selbst (3)
- EGMR, 30.10.1991 - 13163/87
VILVARAJAH ET AUTRES c. ROYAUME-UNI
Auszug aus EGMR, 08.04.2014 - 47509/13
The Contracting States have the right, as a matter of well-established rules of international law, including treaty obligations, in particular the Convention, to control the entry, residence or expulsion of aliens (see, inter alia, Vilvarajah and Others v. the United Kingdom, 30 October 1991, § 102 Series A no. 215, p. 34). - EGMR, 31.01.2006 - 50435/99
Schutz von Ehe und Familie, Abschiebung, Duldung, unerlaubter Aufenthalt, Kinder
Auszug aus EGMR, 08.04.2014 - 47509/13
Nevertheless, in a case which concerns family life as well as immigration, the extent of a State's obligations to admit to its territory relatives of persons residing there will vary according to the particular circumstances of the persons involved and the general interest (see Gül v. Switzerland, judgment of 19 February 1996, Reports 1996-I, pp. 174-75, § 38, and Rodrigues da Silva and Hoogkamer v. the Netherlands, no. 50435/99, § 39, ECHR 2006-I). - EGMR, 05.09.2000 - 44328/98
SOLOMON v. THE NETHERLANDS
Auszug aus EGMR, 08.04.2014 - 47509/13
Factors to be taken into account in this context are the extent to which family life is effectively ruptured, the extent of the ties in the Contracting State, whether there are insurmountable obstacles in the way of the family living in the country of one or more of them and whether there are factors of immigration control (for example, a history of breaches of immigration law) or considerations of public order weighing in favour of exclusion (see, among others, Rodrigues da Silva and Hoogkamer, cited above, ibid., and Solomon v. the Netherlands (dec.), no. 44328/98, 5 September 2000).
- EGMR, 09.07.2021 - 6697/18
Familiennachzug bei subsidiärem Schutz: Kompromiss zwischen Menschenrechten und …
Il indique que, selon la jurisprudence, que « la mise en ?“uvre effective d'un contrôle de l'immigration'peut passer pour un but légitime lié à la préservation du bien-être économique d'un pays propre à justifier une ingérence dans la vie familiale (voir, entre autres, Berrehab c. Pays-Bas, 21 juin 1988, § 26, série A no 138, Nacic et autres c. Suède, no 16567/10, § 79, 15 mai 2012, et J.M. c. Suède (déc.), no 47509/13, § 40, 8 avril 2014).