Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  FAJSTAVR v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC

  No violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing) (englisch)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  FAJSTAVR v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC

  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (2)Zitiert selbst (20)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 26.11.2024 - 1618/18

  SOUROULLAS KEY AND ZANETTOS v. CYPRUS

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.10.2025 - 48303/21

  They asserted that there had been no formalised agreement between N.M. and the prosecutor and that, contrary to the applicant's allegations (see paragraph 39 above), such an agreement was not required by the Court's case-law (they referred, in this respect, to Souroullas Kay and Zannettos v. Cyprus, no. 1618/18, 26 November 2024).

  68725/16 and 2 others, 25 October 2022 (paragraphs 28-50 of the opinion); Souroullas Kay and Zannettos, no. 1618/18, 26 November 2024 (paragraphs 5-36 of the opinion); Yüksel Yalçınkaya v. Türkiye [GC] no. 15669/20, 26 September 2023 (paragraphs 7-9 of the opinion); Snijders v. the Netherlands, no. 56440/15, 6 February 2024 (paragraphs 24-86 of the opinion); W.R. v. the Netherlands, no. 989/18, 27 August 2024 (paragraphs 4-39 of the opinion); Sakkou v. Cyprus, no. 4429/23, 10 July 2025 (paragraphs 8-13 of the opinion); Opalenko v. Ukraine, no. 46673/18, 17 July 2025 (paragraphs 4-15 of the opinion).

• EGMR, 26.09.2023 - 15669/20

  YALÇINKAYA v. TURKEY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.10.2025 - 48303/21

  68725/16 and 2 others, 25 October 2022 (paragraphs 28-50 of the opinion); Souroullas Kay and Zannettos, no. 1618/18, 26 November 2024 (paragraphs 5-36 of the opinion); Yüksel Yalçınkaya v. Türkiye [GC] no. 15669/20, 26 September 2023 (paragraphs 7-9 of the opinion); Snijders v. the Netherlands, no. 56440/15, 6 February 2024 (paragraphs 24-86 of the opinion); W.R. v. the Netherlands, no. 989/18, 27 August 2024 (paragraphs 4-39 of the opinion); Sakkou v. Cyprus, no. 4429/23, 10 July 2025 (paragraphs 8-13 of the opinion); Opalenko v. Ukraine, no. 46673/18, 17 July 2025 (paragraphs 4-15 of the opinion).
• EGMR, 05.02.2015 - 22251/08

  [ENG]

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.10.2025 - 48303/21

  The Court may interfere in this field only if a domestic court assesses evidence arbitrarily or manifestly unreasonably (see Bochan v. Ukraine (no. 2) [GC], no. 22251/08, § 61, ECHR 2015).

• EGMR, 19.07.2012 - 29881/07

  [ENG]

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.10.2025 - 48303/21

  The Court's only concern is to examine whether the proceedings were conducted fairly and, in particular, whether the defendant's rights were not unacceptably restricted and that he or she remained able to participate effectively in the proceedings (see, for example, Stanford v. the United Kingdom, 23 February 1994, § 26, Series A no. 282-A, and Sievert v. Germany, no. 29881/07, § 62, 19 July 2012).
• EGMR, 04.10.2022 - 78017/17

  MORTIER c. BELGIQUE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.10.2025 - 48303/21

  Similarly, in my partly dissenting opinion concerning euthanasia in Mortier v. Belgium (no. 78017/17, 4 October 2022), I argued that because euthanasia was not permitted by Article 2 of the Convention as an exception to the prohibition of deprivation of life, its legal regulation by the relevant member State did not render it permissible under the Convention.
• EGMR, 23.02.1994 - 16757/90

  STANFORD v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.10.2025 - 48303/21

  The Court's only concern is to examine whether the proceedings were conducted fairly and, in particular, whether the defendant's rights were not unacceptably restricted and that he or she remained able to participate effectively in the proceedings (see, for example, Stanford v. the United Kingdom, 23 February 1994, § 26, Series A no. 282-A, and Sievert v. Germany, no. 29881/07, § 62, 19 July 2012).
• EGMR, 17.01.2017 - 43000/11

  HABRAN c. BELGIQUE et 1 autre requête

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.10.2025 - 48303/21

  The sometimes ambiguous nature of such statements and the risk that a person may be accused and tried on the basis of unverified allegations that are not necessarily disinterested must not, therefore, be underestimated (see Habran and Dalem v. Belgium, nos. 43000/11 and 49380/11, § 100, 17 January 2017).
• EGMR, 12.11.2019 - 45084/14

  ADAMCO v. SLOVAKIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.10.2025 - 48303/21

  Rn. 41 Referring to the general principles set out in Xenofontos and Others v. Cyprus (nos. 8725/16, 74339/16 and 74359/16, 25 October 2022), the Government submitted that the present case had to be distinguished from those in which the Court had found a violation of Article 6 (see Adamčo v. Slovakia, no. 45084/14, § 71, 12 November 2019, and Erik Adamčo v. Slovakia, no. 19990/20, § 76, 1 June 2023), in which the cooperating accused had practically been granted immunity.
• EGMR, 10.07.2025 - 79340/16

  TOMENKO v. UKRAINE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.10.2025 - 48303/21

  This is a practice with which, in any event, I am not in agreement (see mutatis mutandis, my partly dissenting opinion in Tomenko v. Ukraine, no. 79340/16, 10 July 2025).
• EGMR, 27.08.2024 - 989/18

  W.R. v. THE NETHERLANDS

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.10.2025 - 48303/21

  68725/16 and 2 others, 25 October 2022 (paragraphs 28-50 of the opinion); Souroullas Kay and Zannettos, no. 1618/18, 26 November 2024 (paragraphs 5-36 of the opinion); Yüksel Yalçınkaya v. Türkiye [GC] no. 15669/20, 26 September 2023 (paragraphs 7-9 of the opinion); Snijders v. the Netherlands, no. 56440/15, 6 February 2024 (paragraphs 24-86 of the opinion); W.R. v. the Netherlands, no. 989/18, 27 August 2024 (paragraphs 4-39 of the opinion); Sakkou v. Cyprus, no. 4429/23, 10 July 2025 (paragraphs 8-13 of the opinion); Opalenko v. Ukraine, no. 46673/18, 17 July 2025 (paragraphs 4-15 of the opinion).
• EGMR, 06.02.2024 - 56440/15

  SNIJDERS v. THE NETHERLANDS
• EGMR, 27.03.2008 - 34499/06

  PERIC v. CROATIA
• EGMR, 17.10.2019 - 26581/17

  ODDONE AND PECCI v. SAN MARINO
• EGMR, 25.10.2022 - 68725/16

  XENOFONTOS v. CYPRUS
• EGMR, 01.06.2023 - 19990/20

  ADAMCO v. SLOVAKIA
• EGMR, 02.06.2015 - 12512/07

  SHIMAN c. ROUMANIE
• EGMR, 10.07.2025 - 4429/23

  SAKKOU v. CYPRUS
• EGMR, 17.07.2025 - 46673/18

  OPALENKO v. UKRAINE
• EGMR, 27.10.1978 - 6538/74
• EGMR - 74339/16 (anhängig)

  CRASOPOULIS v. CYPRUS and 1 other application

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 18.12.2025 - 37514/20

  CERNÝ v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC

  68725/16 and 2 others, 25 October 2022 (paragraphs 28-50 of the opinion); Souroullas Kay and Zannettos, no. 1618/18, 26 November 2024 (paragraphs 5-36 of the opinion); Yüksel Yalçınkaya v. Türkiye [GC] no. 15669/20, 26 September 2023 (paragraphs 7-9 of the opinion); Snijders v. the Netherlands, no. 56440/15, 6 February 2024 (paragraphs 24-86 of the opinion); W.R. v. the Netherlands, no. 989/18, 27 August 2024 (paragraphs 4-39 of the opinion); Sakkou v. Cyprus, no. 4429/23, 10 July 2025 (paragraphs 8-13 of the opinion); Opalenko v. Ukraine, no. 46673/18, 17 July 2025 (paragraphs 4-15 of the opinion); Fajstavr v. the Czech Repubic, no. 48303/21, 16 October 2025 (paragraphs 5-40 of the opinion).
• EGMR, 27.11.2025 - 46911/21

  RENOUARD c. FRANCE

  [18] À cet égard, au paragraphe 40 de mon opinion dissidente dans l'arrêt Fajstavr c. République tchèque (no 48303/21, 16 octobre 2025), j'ai exposé ce qui suit:.