Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  NAUMENKO AND SIA RIX SHIPPING v. LATVIA

  Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione personae;No violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for correspondence;Respect for home;Respect for private life) ...

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  NAUMENKO AND SIA RIX SHIPPING v. LATVIA

  Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 1 MRK
  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (16)Zitiert selbst (3)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 16.04.2002 - 37971/97

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.06.2022 - 50805/14

  The Court, having regard to its case-law, finds that there has been an interference with the second applicant's right to respect for its "home" and "correspondence" (see, for example, Société Colas Est and Others v. France, no. 37971/97, §§ 40-42, ECHR 2002-III; Wieser and Bicos Beteiligungen GmbH v. Austria, no. 74336/01, § 45, ECHR 2007-IV; and Vinci Construction and GTM Génie Civil et Services, cited above, §§ 70 and 72).
• EGMR, 20.03.2018 - 37685/10

  RADOMILJA AND OTHERS v. CROATIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.06.2022 - 50805/14

  The Court, being the master of the characterisation to be given in law to the facts of a case (see Radomilja and Others v. Croatia [GC], nos. 37685/10 and 22768/12, § 114, 20 March 2018), considers that this complaint falls to be examined solely under Article 8 of the Convention, which reads as follows:.
• EGMR, 14.03.2013 - 24117/08

  [ENG]

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.06.2022 - 50805/14

  This should not, however, prevent the Court from taking into account, in its wider assessment of the merits of the application, the second applicant's interest in protecting its "officials", "employees" and "other persons" (see paragraph 42 below) given the wide scope of the judicial authorisation in the present case (compare Bernh Larsen Holding AS and Others v. Norway, no. 24117/08, §§ 90 and 107, 14 March 2013).

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• Generalanwalt beim EuGH, 20.06.2024 - C-258/23

  Imagens Médicas Integradas - Vorlage zur Vorabentscheidung - Zuwiderhandlung …

  {FN:48} Vgl. EGMR, Urteil vom 16. April 2002, Cola Est u. a./Frankreich (CE:ECHR:2002:0416JUD003797197, §§ 48 und 49), sowie insbesondere zur Geschäftskorrespondenz Urteile vom 14. März 2013, Bernh Larsen Holding AS u. a./Norwegen (CE:ECHR:2013:0314JUD002411708, §§ 172 bis 174), vom 23. Juni 2022, Naumenco und Sia Rix Shippinc/Lettland (CE:ECHR:2022:0623JUD005080514, § 62) und vom 4. April 2023, Uab Kesko Senukai/Litauen (CE:ECHR:2023:0404JUD001916219, §§ 113 und 118 und die dort angeführte Rechtsprechung).
• EGMR, 19.12.2024 - 29550/17

  GRANDE ORIENTE D'ITALIA v. ITALY

  63629/10 and 60567/10, § 63, 2 April 2015; Naumenko and SIA Rix Shipping v. Latvia, no. 50805/14, § 45, 23 June 2022; and UAB Kesko Senukai Lithuania v. Lithuania, no. 19162/19, § 109, 4 April 2023).
• EGMR, 28.04.2026 - 45864/22

  KANEV AND BULGARIAN HELSINKI COMMITTEE v. BULGARIA

  63629/10 and 60567/10, § 63, 2 April 2015; M.N. and Others v. San Marino, cited above, §§ 54-55; Sérvulo & Associados - Sociedade de Advogados, RL and Others v. Portugal, no. 27013/10, § 76, 3 September 2015; Saber v. Norway, no. 459/18, § 48, 17 December 2020; Särgava v. Estonia, no. 698/19, § 85, 16 November 2021; and Naumenko and SIA Rix Shipping v. Latvia, no. 50805/14, § 45, 23 June 2022).

• EGMR, 06.12.2022 - 3468/20

  SUBASI c. TURQUIE et 29 autres affaires

  It will therefore proceed on the basis that the interference complained of was "in accordance with the law" (see, for a similar approach, mutatis mutandis, Naumenko and SIA Rix Shipping v. Latvia, no. 50805/14, § 48, 23 June 2022).
• EGMR, 01.04.2025 - 2799/16

  SHIPS WASTE OIL COLLECTOR B.V. ET AUTRES c. PAYS-BAS

  Given that they concerned legal persons, a wider margin of appreciation was to be applied than would have been the case had they concerned an individual (they referred to Bernh Larsen Holding AS and Others v. Norway, no. 24117/08, §§ 158-59, 14 March 2013, and Naumenko and SIA Rix Shipping v. Latvia, no. 50805/14, § 51, 23 June 2022).
• EGMR, 06.02.2025 - 36617/18

  ITALGOMME PNEUMATICI S.R.L. v. ITALY and 12 other applications

  In cases concerning searches and inspections in general which are carried out on the premises of legal entities, the Court has clarified that an element to be taken into consideration is whether a search was based on a warrant issued by a judge and was based on reasonable suspicion (see Wieser and Bicos Beteiligungen GmbH v. Austria, no. 74336/01, § 57, ECHR 2007-IV; DELTA PEKÁRNY a.s. v. the Czech Republic, no. 97/11, § 83, 2 October 2014; and Naumenko and SIA Rix Shipping v. Latvia, no. 50805/14, §§ 54-55, 23 June 2022).
• EGMR, 16.05.2023 - 2800/16

  JANSSEN DE JONG GROEP B.V. AND OTHERS v. THE NETHERLANDS

  The Court reiterates that legal persons may, under certain circumstances, claim rights to respect of their business premises and correspondence under Article 8 (see, inter alia, Naumenko and SIA Rix Shipping v. Latvia, no. 50805/14, § 46, 23 June 2022, and Bernh Larsen Holding AS and Others v. Norway, no. 24117/08, §§ 105-06, 14 March 2013).
• EGMR, 22.06.2023 - 10794/12

  GERMANO v. ITALY

  While it is for the national authorities to make the initial assessment of necessity, the final evaluation as to whether the reasons cited for the interference are relevant and sufficient remains subject to review by the Court for conformity with the requirements of the Convention (see Ghailan and Others v. Spain, no. 36366/14, § 62, 23 March 2021, and Naumenko and SIA Rix Shipping v. Latvia, no. 50805/14, § 50, 23 June 2022).
• EGMR, 16.05.2023 - 2799/16

  SHIPS WASTE OIL COLLECTOR B.V. v. THE NETHERLANDS

  The Court reiterates that legal persons may, under certain circumstances, claim rights to respect of their business premises and correspondence under Article 8 (see, inter alia, Naumenko and SIA Rix Shipping v. Latvia, no. 50805/14, § 46, 23 June 2022, and Bernh Larsen Holding AS and Others v. Norway, no. 24117/08, §§ 105-06, 14 March 2013).
• EGMR, 15.05.2025 - 3795/22

  VERSACI v. ITALY

  It is of fundamental importance that the national authorities state the reason for administrative acts affecting individual interests (see Giuliano Germano, cited above, § 132): it is for the national authorities to make the initial assessment of necessity, while the final evaluation as to whether the reasons cited for the interference are relevant and sufficient remains subject to review by the Court for conformity with the requirements of the Convention (see Ghailan and Others v. Spain, no. 36366/14, § 62, 23 March 2021, and Naumenko and SIA Rix Shipping v. Latvia, no. 50805/14, § 50, 23 June 2022).
• EGMR, 18.03.2025 - 38798/13

  BRD - GROUPE SOCIETE GENERALE S.A. v. ROMANIA
• EGMR, 16.05.2023 - 3124/16

  BURANDO HOLDING B.V. v. THE NETHERLANDS
• EGMR, 04.04.2023 - 19162/19

  UAB ,,KESKO SENUKAI LITHUANIA" v. LITHUANIA
• EGMR, 17.02.2026 - 6580/22

  GREEN ALLIANCE v. BULGARIA
• EGMR, 04.07.2024 - 24460/16

  RUSTAMKHANLI v. AZERBAIJAN
• EGMR, 26.09.2024 - 25054/23

  SOCIÉTÉ ALTEN c. FRANCE