Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  KALKAN v. DENMARK

  Violation of Article 2 - Right to life (Article 2 - Positive obligations;Article 2-1 - Life) (Substantive aspect);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction) (englisch)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  KALKAN v. DENMARK

  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (5)Zitiert selbst (9)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 11.06.2024 - 47909/19

  T.V. v. CROATIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.05.2025 - 51781/22

  The object and purpose of the Convention as an instrument for the protection of individual human beings requires that its provisions be interpreted and applied so as to make its safeguards practical and effective (see, among many other authorities, Salman v. Turkey [GC], no. 21986/93, § 97, ECHR 2000-VII; Giuliani and Gaggio v. Italy [GC], no. 23458/02, §§ 174 and 177, ECHR 2011 (extracts); and T.V. v. Croatia, no. 47909/19, § 46, 11 June 2024).

  Making its assessment on an equitable basis as required by Article 41 of the Convention, it awards EUR 25, 000 under this head (see also, among others, Saoud, cited above, § 140; Tekın and Arslan, cited above, § 116; and T.V. v. Croatia, no. 47909/19, § 78, 11 June 2024).

• EGMR, 21.06.2011 - 31151/08

  [ENG]

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.05.2025 - 51781/22

  Rn. 52 In September 2006, Mr Obiora died after being arrested by police officers in Trondheim (see Obiora v. Norway (dec.), no. 31151/08, 21 June 2011).

  For example, in the Benjamin case (see paragraph 40 above) the person had been placed in a "fixed leg lock", considerable pressure was applied to his back, and the police failed to monitor his state of health for approximately seven minutes; in the Løgstør case (see paragraph 41 above) medical opinions had emphasised the severe obesity of the detainee combined with his intense activity and possible use of controlled substances; in Saoud, cited above, pressure had been applied to the body of a young man for thirty-five minutes; in Obiora v. Norway, ((dec.), no. 31151/08, 21June 2011), considerable pressure had also been used.

• EGMR, 15.09.2020 - 45439/18

  AGGERHOLM v. DENMARK

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.05.2025 - 51781/22

  The Court therefore finds it necessary to assess and decide the applicant's claim for costs and expenses (see, for instance, Aggerholm v. Denmark, no. 45439/18, § 126, 15 September 2020).

• EGMR, 03.10.2023 - 27753/19

  EL-ASMAR v. DENMARK

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.05.2025 - 51781/22

  In the present case, regard being had to the documents in its possession, the above criteria, awards made in comparable cases against Denmark (see, notably, El-Asmar v. Denmark, no. 27753/19, § 88, 3 October 2023; Aggerholm, cited above, § 127; and Daugaard Sorensen v. Denmark, no. 25650/22, § 81, 15 October 2024), and the fact that the applicant has already been paid DKK 40, 000 under the Danish Legal Aid Act, the Court considers it reasonable to award an additional sum of EUR 6, 000 to cover the costs for the proceedings before the Court.
• EGMR, 15.10.2024 - 25650/22

  DAUGAARD SORENSEN v. DENMARK

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.05.2025 - 51781/22

  In the present case, regard being had to the documents in its possession, the above criteria, awards made in comparable cases against Denmark (see, notably, El-Asmar v. Denmark, no. 27753/19, § 88, 3 October 2023; Aggerholm, cited above, § 127; and Daugaard Sorensen v. Denmark, no. 25650/22, § 81, 15 October 2024), and the fact that the applicant has already been paid DKK 40, 000 under the Danish Legal Aid Act, the Court considers it reasonable to award an additional sum of EUR 6, 000 to cover the costs for the proceedings before the Court.
• EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 21986/93

  Verursachung des Todes eines Gefangenen in türkischer Haft - Umfang der …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.05.2025 - 51781/22

  The object and purpose of the Convention as an instrument for the protection of individual human beings requires that its provisions be interpreted and applied so as to make its safeguards practical and effective (see, among many other authorities, Salman v. Turkey [GC], no. 21986/93, § 97, ECHR 2000-VII; Giuliani and Gaggio v. Italy [GC], no. 23458/02, §§ 174 and 177, ECHR 2011 (extracts); and T.V. v. Croatia, no. 47909/19, § 46, 11 June 2024).
• EGMR, 20.03.2018 - 37685/10

  RADOMILJA AND OTHERS v. CROATIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.05.2025 - 51781/22

  Rn. 69 As a master of the characterisation to be given in law to the facts of the case before it (see Radomilja and Others v. Croatia [GC], nos. 37685/10 and 22768/12, § 114 and 126, 20 March 2018), the Court considers that the applicant's complaints should be examined only under Article 2 of the Convention, the relevant part of which reads as follows:.
• EGMR, 19.01.2023 - 32245/19

  MACHALIKASHVILI AND OTHERS v. GEORGIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.05.2025 - 51781/22

  Rn. 94 In the light of the importance of the protection afforded by Article2, the Court must subject allegations of a breach of this provision to the most careful scrutiny, taking into consideration not only the actions of State agents but also all the surrounding circumstances - including such matters as the relevant legal or regulatory framework in place and the planning and control of the actions under examination (see Makaratzis v. Greece [GC], no. 50385/99, §§ 57-59, ECHR 2004-XI; Tekin and Arslan v. Belgium, no. 37795/13, § 84, 5 September 2017; and Machalikashvili and Others v. Georgia, no. 32245/19, § 99, 19 January 2023).
• EGMR, 16.11.2017 - 30059/15

  BOUKROUROU ET AUTRES c. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.05.2025 - 51781/22

  Following Saoud v. France (no. 9375/02, 9 October 2007), the French authorities issued a note of 8 October 2008 to the police on the use of force, which set out the following (see Boukrourou and Others v. France, no. 30059/15, Chapter II.B.1.b, 16 November 2017):.

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 15.01.2026 - 32707/19

  MAGHERINI AND OTHERS v. ITALY

  The Court is therefore satisfied of the existence of a causal link between the force used and the fatal outcome (compare and contrast Saoud, cited above, § 97; Semache, cited above, § 77; and Kalkan v. Denmark, no. 51781/22, § 121, 27 May 2025).
• EGMR, 21.10.2025 - 16756/24

  MORTENSEN v. DENMARK

  As regards the proceedings before it, regard being had to the documents in its possession, the above criteria and to awards made in comparable cases against Denmark (see, among other authorities, Kalkan v. Denmark, no. 51781/22, § 138, 27 May 2025; Daugaard Sorensen v. Denmark, no. 25650/22, § 81, 15 October 2024; Nguyen v. Denmark, no. 2116/21, § 49, 9 April 2024; Sarac v. Denmark, no. 19866/21, § 48, 9 April 2024; and El-Asmar v. Denmark, no. 27753/19, § 88, 3 October 2023), the Court considers it reasonable to award EUR 10, 000 covering the costs for the proceedings before it, plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicant, in so far as these have not already been compensated for under the Danish Legal Aid Act.
• EGMR, 31.03.2026 - 10297/23

  MAKKI v. DENMARK

  In the present case, regard being had to the documents in its possession, the above criteria and to awards made in comparable cases against Denmark (see, among others, Kalkan v. Denmark, no. 51781/22, § 138, 27 May 2025 [if final]; Daugaard Sorensen v. Denmark, no. 25650/22, § 81, 15 October 2024; El-Asmar v. Denmark, no. 27753/19, § 88, 3 October 2023; Aggerholm, cited above, § 127; and Tim Henrik Bruun Hansen v. Denmark, no. 51072/15, § 92, 9 July 2019), and to the fact that the applicant has already received DKK 40, 000 under the Danish Legal Aid Act, the Court considers it reasonable to award an additional sum of EUR 6, 000 covering the costs for the proceedings before the Court, including the legal fee and transportation costs.
• EGMR, 05.05.2026 - 34232/24

  POULSEN v. DENMARK

  Rn. 30 Having regard to the general principles restated in Tsaava and Others v. Georgia ([GC], nos. 13186/20 and 4 others, § 497, 11 December 2025), the documents in its possession and awards made in comparable cases against Denmark (see, notably, Kalkan v. Denmark, no. 51781/22, § 138, 27 May 2025; El-Asmar, cited above, § 88; Aggerholm, cited above, § 127; and Daugaard Sorensen v. Denmark, no. 25650/22, § 81, 15 October 2024), the Court considers it reasonable to award EUR 10, 000 to cover the costs and expenses for the proceedings before the Court, plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicant.
• EGMR - 6187/25 (anhängig)

  SLOVAQUIE c. BELGIQUE

  b) Les autorités internes ont-elles respecté leur obligation positive de protéger la vie de M. J.C., qui se trouvait sous leur contrôle et donc dans une situation vulnérable (pour un exemple récent, voir Kalkan c. Danemark, no 51781/22, § 95, 27 mai 2025) ? En particulier, existait-il un cadre juridique et administratif approprié, et les responsables de l'application des lois - notamment les policiers ayant pris part aux événements des 23 et 24 février 2018 - avaient-ils reçu une formation leur garantissant un niveau élevé de compétence et les rendant aptes à éviter tout traitement contraire à l'article 2 de la Convention (Tekın et Arslan, précité, §§ 92-98, et Kalkan, précité, §§ 96 et 98-129) ?.