Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  KOGAN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  Violation of Article 38 - Examination of the case-general (Article 38 - Obligation to furnish all necessary facilities);Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for family life;Respect for private ...

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  KOGAN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (5)Zitiert selbst (11)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 11.05.2021 - 44561/11

  RID NOVAYA GAZETA AND ZAO NOVAYA GAZETA v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 07.03.2023 - 54003/20

  Lastly, the Court does not lose sight of the overall hostile context and the political and social climate in which many NGOs, human rights defenders and other civil society actors were operating in the past years in Russia, including severe restrictions on their funding or on their projects resulting in significant "chilling effect" on their activities (see Ecodefence and Others v. Russia, nos. 9988/13 and 60 others, 14 June 2022; Centre of Societies for Krishna Consciousness in Russia and Frolov v. Russia, no. 37477/11, §§ 8-10, 41-42, 23 November 2021; RID Novaya Gazeta and ZAO Novaya Gazeta v. Russia, no. 44561/11, § 91, 11 May 2021; and Navalnyy, cited above, §§ 147-52 and 172-75).
• EGMR, 23.11.2021 - 37477/11

  CENTRALISED RELIGIOUS ORGANISATION CENTRE OF KRISHNA CONSCIOUSNESS SOCIETIES IN …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 07.03.2023 - 54003/20

  Lastly, the Court does not lose sight of the overall hostile context and the political and social climate in which many NGOs, human rights defenders and other civil society actors were operating in the past years in Russia, including severe restrictions on their funding or on their projects resulting in significant "chilling effect" on their activities (see Ecodefence and Others v. Russia, nos. 9988/13 and 60 others, 14 June 2022; Centre of Societies for Krishna Consciousness in Russia and Frolov v. Russia, no. 37477/11, §§ 8-10, 41-42, 23 November 2021; RID Novaya Gazeta and ZAO Novaya Gazeta v. Russia, no. 44561/11, § 91, 11 May 2021; and Navalnyy, cited above, §§ 147-52 and 172-75).
• EGMR, 15.10.2020 - 80982/12

  MUHAMMAD ET MUHAMMAD c. ROUMANIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 07.03.2023 - 54003/20

  Given the above, the Court concludes that the proceedings related to the revocation of the first applicant's residence permit were tainted with gross procedural defects that undermined their fairness and went beyond the permissible procedural limitations in cases of expulsion on national security grounds (see, mutatis mutandis, Muhammad and Muhammad v. Romania [GC], no. 80982/12, §§ 129-33, 15 October 2020).

• EGMR, 06.10.2022 - 35599/20

  JUSZCZYSZYN v. POLAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 07.03.2023 - 54003/20

  In the Court's opinion, that allegation constitutes a fundamental aspect of the present case and merits detailed examination (see Merabishvili, cited above, § 291; Juszczyszyn v. Poland, no. 35599/20, § 317, 6 October 2022; Miroslava Todorova v. Bulgaria, no. 40072/13, § 203, 19 October 2021; and Azizov and Novruzlu v. Azerbaijan, nos. 65583/13 and 70106/13, § 68, 18 February 2021).
• EGMR, 24.01.2023 - 17912/15

  KUTAYEV v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 07.03.2023 - 54003/20

  the decision of the President of the Section to appoint one of the elected judges of the Court to sit as ad hoc judge, applying by analogy Rule 29 § 2 of the Rules of Court (see, for a similar situation and an explanation of the background, Kutayev v. Russia, no. 17912/15, §§ 4-8, 24 January 2023);.
• EGMR, 26.07.2011 - 29157/09

  [ENG]

  Auszug aus EGMR, 07.03.2023 - 54003/20

  As regards "in accordance with the law" and "legitimate aim" requirements, the Court in the present case may dispense with ruling on both because, irrespective of the lawfulness of the measures taken against the first applicant and the legitimacy of aim declared by the authorities, they fell short of being necessary in a democratic society, for the reasons set out below (see Gaspar, cited above, § 41; Liu v. Russia (no. 2), no. 29157/09, § 79, 26 July 2011; and Gablishvili v. Russia, no. 39428/12, § 45, 26 June 2014).
• EGMR, 19.10.2021 - 40072/13

  TODOROVA c. BULGARIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 07.03.2023 - 54003/20

  In the Court's opinion, that allegation constitutes a fundamental aspect of the present case and merits detailed examination (see Merabishvili, cited above, § 291; Juszczyszyn v. Poland, no. 35599/20, § 317, 6 October 2022; Miroslava Todorova v. Bulgaria, no. 40072/13, § 203, 19 October 2021; and Azizov and Novruzlu v. Azerbaijan, nos. 65583/13 and 70106/13, § 68, 18 February 2021).
• EGMR, 26.06.2014 - 39428/12

  GABLISHVILI v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 07.03.2023 - 54003/20

  As regards "in accordance with the law" and "legitimate aim" requirements, the Court in the present case may dispense with ruling on both because, irrespective of the lawfulness of the measures taken against the first applicant and the legitimacy of aim declared by the authorities, they fell short of being necessary in a democratic society, for the reasons set out below (see Gaspar, cited above, § 41; Liu v. Russia (no. 2), no. 29157/09, § 79, 26 July 2011; and Gablishvili v. Russia, no. 39428/12, § 45, 26 June 2014).
• EGMR, 18.02.2021 - 65583/13

  MAMMAD AZIZOV v. AZERBAIJAN

  Auszug aus EGMR, 07.03.2023 - 54003/20

  In the Court's opinion, that allegation constitutes a fundamental aspect of the present case and merits detailed examination (see Merabishvili, cited above, § 291; Juszczyszyn v. Poland, no. 35599/20, § 317, 6 October 2022; Miroslava Todorova v. Bulgaria, no. 40072/13, § 203, 19 October 2021; and Azizov and Novruzlu v. Azerbaijan, nos. 65583/13 and 70106/13, § 68, 18 February 2021).
• EGMR, 07.11.2019 - 64581/16

  JAFAROV v. AZERBAIJAN

  Auszug aus EGMR, 07.03.2023 - 54003/20

  In assessing that point, the Court will have regard to the nature and degree of reprehensibility of the alleged ulterior purpose, and bear in mind that the Convention was designed to maintain and promote the ideals and values of a democratic society governed by the rule of law (see Merabishvili, cited above, § 307; Natig Jafarov v. Azerbaijan, no. 64581/16, § 69, 7 November 2019; and Navalnyy, cited above, §§ 173-74).
• EGMR, 12.06.2018 - 23038/15

  GASPAR v. RUSSIA

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 06.10.2026 - 26760/21

  S.B. v. RUSSIA

  Such interference will be compatible with Article 8 of the Convention only if it is "in accordance with the law", pursues one or more of the legitimate aims listed in paragraph 2 and is "necessary in a democratic society" (see Kogan and Others v. Russia, no. 54003/20, § 58, 7 March 2023).
• EGMR, 06.06.2023 - 2134/23

  PIVKINA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  In the cases where all acts and judicial decisions leading to the alleged Convention violations occurred up until the termination date, the Court determined that it had jurisdiction to deal with them (see, among others, Fedotova and Others, cited above, § 73; Svetova and Others v. Russia, no. 54714/17, § 28, 24 January 2023; Kogan and Others v. Russia, no. 54003/20, § 49, 7 March 2023; and Ossewaarde v. Russia, no. 27227/17, § 28, 7 March 2023).
• EGMR, 11.02.2025 - 6035/19

  PALFREEMAN v. BULGARIA

  The applicant has not shown any improper interference or other action on the part of public officials indicative of the ulterior purpose claimed by him (contrast, for instance, Miroslava Todorova v. Bulgaria, no. 40072/13, §§ 208-10, 19 October 2021, and Kogan and Others v. Russia, no. 54003/20, §§ 72-73, 7 March 2023).
• EGMR - 43381/20 (anhängig)

  PAKETOVA AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA

  Did the alleged interference with the applicants' rights under Article 8 of the Convention pursue, solely or predominantly, a purpose other than those prescribed in the Convention, contrary to Article 18 (see, mutatis mutandis, Kogan and Others v. Russia, no. 54003/20, §§ 67-78, 7 March 2023)?.
• EGMR - 4152/20 (anhängig)

  PAKETOV AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA

  Did the alleged interference with the applicants' rights pursue, solely or predominantly, a purpose other than those prescribed in the Convention, contrary to Article 18 (see, mutatis mutandis, Kogan and Others v. Russia, no. 54003/20, §§ 67-78, 7 March 2023)?.