Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  JANAKIESKI v. NORTH MACEDONIA

  Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-3 - Reasonableness of pre-trial detention);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-4 - Speediness of review) (englisch)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  JANAKIESKI v. NORTH MACEDONIA and 1 other application

  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (7)Zitiert selbst (18)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 08.02.2018 - 33566/11

  RAMKOVSKI v. "THE FORMER YUGOSLAV REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA"

  Auszug aus EGMR, 14.11.2023 - 57325/19

  Rn. 60 Lastly, it is noteworthy that in previous cases against the respondent State concerning complaints lodged under Article 5 § 3 (see Vasilkoski and Others v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, no. 28169/08, 28 October 2010; Miladinov and Others v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, nos. 46398/09 and 2 others, 50570/09 and 50576/09, 24 April 2014; and Ramkovski v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, no. 33566/11, 8 February 2018) the Government did not argue that a compensation claim was an effective remedy for the purposes of that provision.

  The Court has previously found such delays to be excessive (see, for example, Snyatovskiy v. Russia, no. 10341/07, § 65, 13 December 2016, and contrast Ramkovski v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, no. 33566/11, § 75, 8 February 2018).

• EGMR, 09.02.2021 - 73329/16

  HASSELBAINK v. THE NETHERLANDS

  Auszug aus EGMR, 14.11.2023 - 57325/19

  The Court reiterates that only a reasoned decision by the judicial authorities can effectively demonstrate to the parties that they have been heard and make appeals and public scrutiny of the administration of justice possible (see Hasselbaink v. the Netherlands, no. 73329/16, § 77, 9 February 2021).
• EGMR, 09.02.2023 - 5432/15

  UGULAVA v. GEORGIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 14.11.2023 - 57325/19

  By overturning the rule enshrined in Article 5 of the Convention, a provision which makes detention an exceptional departure from the right to liberty and one that is only permissible in exhaustively enumerated and strictly defined cases, the court shifted the burden of proof to the applicant (see Ugulava v. Georgia, no. 5432/15, § 111, 9 February 2023).

• EGMR, 28.10.2010 - 28169/08

  [ENG]

  Auszug aus EGMR, 14.11.2023 - 57325/19

  Rn. 60 Lastly, it is noteworthy that in previous cases against the respondent State concerning complaints lodged under Article 5 § 3 (see Vasilkoski and Others v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, no. 28169/08, 28 October 2010; Miladinov and Others v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, nos. 46398/09 and 2 others, 50570/09 and 50576/09, 24 April 2014; and Ramkovski v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, no. 33566/11, 8 February 2018) the Government did not argue that a compensation claim was an effective remedy for the purposes of that provision.
• EGMR - 50933/18 (anhängig)

  MELNYK v. UKRAINE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 14.11.2023 - 57325/19

  Furthermore, they did not include an appropriate assessment of the continued justification for the applicant's house arrest despite the passage of time (see Vadym Melnyk v. Ukraine, nos. 62209/17 and 50933/18, § 112, 15 September 2022).
• EGMR, 04.04.2023 - 43674/16

  RADONJIC AND ROMIC v. SERBIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 14.11.2023 - 57325/19

  Rn. 74 The relevant general principles have recently been summarised in Radonjić and Romić v. Serbia (no. 43674/16, §§ 62-70, 4 April 2023).
• EGMR, 13.12.2022 - 11811/20

  ELMAZOVA AND OTHERS v. NORTH MACEDONIA and 1 other application

  Auszug aus EGMR, 14.11.2023 - 57325/19

  Rn. 103 According to the Court's case-law, an applicant is entitled to the reimbursement of costs and expenses only in so far as it has been shown that these were actually and necessarily incurred and are reasonable as to quantum (see Elmazova and Others v. North Macedonia, nos. 11811/20 and 13550/20, § 86, 13 December 2022).
• EGMR, 16.11.2021 - 42296/09

  KOVROV v. RUSSIA and 11 other applications

  Auszug aus EGMR, 14.11.2023 - 57325/19

  42296/09 and 4 others, §§ 82-84, 16 November 2021, with further references).
• EGMR, 21.02.2023 - 52048/16

  HYSA v. ALBANIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 14.11.2023 - 57325/19

  However, other than a formal statement to that effect, the panel did not provide any specific reasons for this conclusion (see, similarly, Hysa v. Albania, no. 52048/16, § 76, 21 February 2023) based on the applicant's personal circumstances.
• EGMR, 13.12.2016 - 10341/07

  [ENG]

  Auszug aus EGMR, 14.11.2023 - 57325/19

  The Court has previously found such delays to be excessive (see, for example, Snyatovskiy v. Russia, no. 10341/07, § 65, 13 December 2016, and contrast Ramkovski v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, no. 33566/11, § 75, 8 February 2018).
• EGMR, 26.03.2019 - 56998/16

  VELECKA v. LITHUANIA and 3 other applications
• EGMR, 11.07.2017 - 51249/11

  ORAVEC v. CROATIA
• EGMR, 26.06.2018 - 21786/15

  LAKATOS v. HUNGARY
• EGMR, 28.04.2015 - 6858/11

  DELIJORGJI v. ALBANIA
• EGMR, 24.01.2023 - 77796/17

  TALESKI v. NORTH MACEDONIA and 5 other applications
• EGMR, 06.10.2020 - 76695/11

  UDALTSOV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 11.12.2018 - 47156/16

  KLINKEL v. GERMANY
• EGMR, 09.03.2021 - 77805/14

  SHIPOVIKJ v. "THE FORMER YUGOSLAV REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA" and 1 other application

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 07.07.2026 - 22738/20

  JOVANOV v. NORTH MACEDONIA and 1 other application

  Rn. 2 On 27 June 2019 a public prosecutor opened an investigation into abuse of office in respect of the applicant (a manager of a private company and a former government official) in the context of the criminal proceedings described in Janakieski v. North Macedonia (nos. 57325/19 and 16291/20, § 11, 14 November 2023) and requested that the applicant be detained in prison.

  For the same reasons as those set out in Janakieski v. North Macedonia (nos. 57325/19 and 16291/20, §§ 57-61 and 63-65, 14 November 2023), the Court rejects the Government's argument that a compensation claim under section 553 of the Criminal Proceedings Act and/or sections 9-a and 189 of the Obligations Act was an effective remedy for the purposes of the applicant's complaints.

• EGMR, 23.06.2026 - 34261/23

  TALESKI v. NORTH MACEDONIA and 1 other application

  57325/19 and 16291/20, § 54, 14 November 2023).
• EGMR, 18.06.2026 - 30078/21

  ATANASOVSKI v. NORTH MACEDONIA

  57325/19 and 16291/20, §§ 75-84, 14 November 2023).

• EGMR - 661/24 (anhängig)

  PANKOV v. NORTH MACEDONIA

  57325/19 and 16291/20, §§ 74-85, 14 November 2023)? In this connection, the parties are invited to provide copies of any detention and/or house arrest orders in respect of the applicant adopted after 6 December 2024, any legal remedies submitted against such orders and any decisions adopted upon such legal remedies.
• EGMR - 26734/21 (anhängig)

  JANAKIESKI v. NORTH MACEDONIA

  57325/19 and 16291/20, §§ 77-84, 14 November 2023)? In addition, was the applicant brought before a judge or other officer authorised by law to exercise judicial power, as required by Article 5 § 3 of the Convention (see, for example, Aquilina v. Malta [GC], no. 25642/94, § 50, ECHR 1999-III)?.
• EGMR - 46011/22 (anhängig)

  MITROVSKI v. NORTH MACEDONIA and 1 other application

  Were the review proceedings before the Skopje Court of Appeal regarding the order of 25 July 2022 for the extension of the applicants' house arrest compatible with the "speedy" requirement within the meaning of Article 5 § 4 of the Convention (see Janakieski v. North Macedonia, nos. 57325/19 and 16291/20, § 88, 14 November 2023; Snyatovskiy v. Russia, no. 10341/07, § 65, 13 December 2016)?.
• EGMR - 18455/24 (anhängig)

  ZDRAVEV v. NORTH MACEDONIA and 1 other application

  (a) Were the grounds given by the courts "relevant and sufficient" as required under this provision (see Janakieski v. North Macedonia, nos. 57325/19 and 16291/20, §§ 74-85, 14 November 2023; Ramkovski v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, no. 33566/11, §§ 50-53, 8 February 2018; and Buzadji v. the Republic of Moldova [GC], no. 23755/07, §§ 84-91, 5 July 2016)?.