Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  ELMAZOVA AND OTHERS v. NORTH MACEDONIA

  Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 34) Individual applications;(Art. 34) Victim;Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione personae;Violation of Article 14+P1-2 - Prohibition of discrimination (Article 14 - Discrimination) ...

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  ELMAZOVA AND OTHERS v. NORTH MACEDONIA and 1 other application

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 14, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 2, Protokoll Nr. 12 Art. 1 MRK
  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (2)Neu Zitiert selbst (7)

• EGMR, 09.07.2013 - 35943/10

  VONA v. HUNGARY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 13.12.2022 - 11811/20

  It further reiterates that the coexistence of members of society free from racial segregation is a fundamental value of democratic societies (see, mutatis mutandis, Vona v. Hungary, no. 35943/10, § 57, ECHR 2013) and that inclusive education is the most appropriate means of guaranteeing the fundamental principles of universality and non-discrimination in the exercise of the right to education (see Çam v.Turkey, no. 51500/08, § 64, 23 February 2016).
• EGMR, 31.10.2013 - 12316/07

  POPOVSKI v.

  Auszug aus EGMR, 13.12.2022 - 11811/20

  That is to say, the applicant must have paid them, or be bound to pay them, pursuant to a legal or contractual obligation, and they must have been unavoidable in order to prevent the violation found or to obtain redress (see Popovski v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, no. 12316/07, § 102, 31 October 2013).
• EGMR, 18.05.2004 - 58148/00

  ÉDITIONS PLON c. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 13.12.2022 - 11811/20

  According to the Court's case-law, an applicant is entitled to the reimbursement of costs and expenses only in so far as it has been shown that these were actually and necessarily incurred and are reasonable as to quantum (see Editions Plon v. France, no. 58148/00, § 64, ECHR 2004-IV).

 
• EGMR, 23.02.2016 - 51500/08

  ÇAM c. TURQUIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 13.12.2022 - 11811/20

  It further reiterates that the coexistence of members of society free from racial segregation is a fundamental value of democratic societies (see, mutatis mutandis, Vona v. Hungary, no. 35943/10, § 57, ECHR 2013) and that inclusive education is the most appropriate means of guaranteeing the fundamental principles of universality and non-discrimination in the exercise of the right to education (see Çam v.Turkey, no. 51500/08, § 64, 23 February 2016).
• EGMR, 05.11.2020 - 173/17

  X AND Y v. NORTH MACEDONIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 13.12.2022 - 11811/20

  The Court, being the master of the characterisation to be given in law to the facts of the case (see Radomilja and Others v. Croatia [GC], no. 37685/10, § 124, 20 March 2018, and Söderman v. Sweden [GC], no. 5786/08, § 57, ECHR 2013), considers that the complaint should be analysed under Article 14, to be taken in conjunction with Article 2 of Protocol No. 1 (see, mutatis mutandis, X and Y v. North Macedonia, no. 173/17, § 64, 5 November 2020, and Memedov v. North Macedonia [Committee], no. 31016/17, § 32, 24 June 2021).
• EGMR, 25.06.2019 - 41720/13

  NICOLAE VIRGILIU TANASE c. ROUMANIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 13.12.2022 - 11811/20

  In other words, when one remedy has been pursued, the use of another remedy which has essentially the same objective is not required (see Jasinskis v. Latvia, no. 45744/08, § 50, 21 December 2010, and Nicolae Virgiliu Tanase v. Romania [GC], no. 41720/13, § 177, 25 June 2019).
• EGMR, 24.06.2021 - 31016/17

  MEMEDOV v. NORTH MACEDONIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 13.12.2022 - 11811/20

  The Court, being the master of the characterisation to be given in law to the facts of the case (see Radomilja and Others v. Croatia [GC], no. 37685/10, § 124, 20 March 2018, and Söderman v. Sweden [GC], no. 5786/08, § 57, ECHR 2013), considers that the complaint should be analysed under Article 14, to be taken in conjunction with Article 2 of Protocol No. 1 (see, mutatis mutandis, X and Y v. North Macedonia, no. 173/17, § 64, 5 November 2020, and Memedov v. North Macedonia [Committee], no. 31016/17, § 32, 24 June 2021).

• EGMR, 14.11.2023 - 57325/19

  JANAKIESKI v. NORTH MACEDONIA

  According to the Court's case-law, an applicant is entitled to the reimbursement of costs and expenses only in so far as it has been shown that these were actually and necessarily incurred and are reasonable as to quantum (see Elmazova and Others v. North Macedonia, nos. 11811/20 and 13550/20, § 86, 13 December 2022).
• EGMR, 24.10.2023 - 42429/16

  MEMEDOVA AND OTHERS v. NORTH MACEDONIA

  For the reasons stated in Elmazova and Others v. North Macedonia (nos. 11811/20 and 13550/20, §§ 58-60, 13 December 2022), which likewise apply to this case, the Court finds that the applicants were not required to also make use of the remedy referred to by the Government.