Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  MAMALADZE v. GEORGIA

  Inadmissible (englisch)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  MAMALADZE v. GEORGIA (NO. 2)

  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ...Zitiert selbst (4)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 03.11.2022 - 9487/19

  MAMALADZE v. GEORGIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.06.2025 - 5855/23

  On 31 January 2019 the applicant lodged an application with the Court (Mamaladze v. Georgia, no. 9487/19, 3 November 2022 - "the initial application").

  On 3 November 2022, the Court adopted a judgment in the initial application, which became final on 6 March 2023 (see Mamaladze v. Georgia, no. 9487/19, 3 November 2022).

  The applicant's caution when interacting with his lawyer does not, on the face of it, appear unusual given that the criminal case against him had involved covert surveillance measures (see Mamaladze v. Georgia, no. 9487/19, 3 November 2022, §§ 8-9).

• EGMR, 20.03.2018 - 37685/10

  RADOMILJA AND OTHERS v. CROATIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.06.2025 - 5855/23

  The new complaint accordingly falls outside the scope of the present application (see Radomilja and Others v. Croatia [GC], nos. 37685/10 and 22768/12, §§ 121-25, 20 March 2018).
• EGMR, 09.07.2002 - 46468/99

  MANOUSSOS v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC AND GERMANY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.06.2025 - 5855/23

  While the obligation imposed is of a procedural nature distinguishable from the substantive rights set out in the Convention and Protocols, it flows from the very essence of this procedural right that it is open to individuals to complain of alleged infringements of it in Convention proceedings (see Manoussos v. the Czech Republic and Germany (dec.), no. 46468/99, 9 July 2002).
• EGMR, 04.06.2019 - 4536/06

  AYHAN AND OTHERS v. TURKEY and 1 other application

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.06.2025 - 5855/23

  In such circumstances, the fact that those proceedings have ended (see paragraph 21 above) does not preclude the Court from examining the related complaint made under Article 34 of the Convention, given that it is expressly linked to the proceedings in respect of the applicant's initial application to the Court and was raised by the applicant while those proceedings were still pending (see, for instance, mutatis mutandis, Mehmet Ali Ayhan and Others v. Turkey, nos. 4536/06 and 53282/07, § 38, 4 June 2019).

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 03.02.2026 - 4100/24

  RAMISHVILI v. GEORGIA

  At the material time the applicant was also representing the interests of the defendant in another high-profile criminal case, that received significant media attention, concerning an attempted murder of the Patriarch's personal secretary (hereinafter "the Mamaladze case" - also referred to in the domestic proceedings as "the Cyanide case"; see Mamaladze v. Georgia, no. 9487/19, 3 November 2022, and Mamaladze v. Georgia (dec.), no. 5855/23, 17 June 2025).