Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  MAMALADZE v. GEORGIA

  No violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing);Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Public hearing;Exclusion of public);Violation of Article 6 ...

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  MAMALADZE v. GEORGIA

  Art. 3, Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 6 Abs. 2 MRK
  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (5)Neu Zitiert selbst (19)

• EGMR, 26.03.2002 - 48297/99

  BUTKEVICIUS v. LITHUANIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 03.11.2022 - 9487/19

  However, this circumstance could not justify any use of words chosen by the officials in their interviews with the press (see Butkevicius v. Lithuania, no. 48297/99, § 50, ECHR 2002-II (extracts)).
• EGMR, 10.05.2005 - 6569/04

  ARRIGO AND VELLA v. MALTA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 03.11.2022 - 9487/19

  The Court has considered that in a democratic society it is inevitable that information is imparted when a serious charge of misconduct in office is brought (see Arrigo and Vella v. Malta (dec.), no. 6569/04, 10 May 2005).
• EGMR, 26.03.1982 - 8269/78

  Adolf ./. Österreich

  Auszug aus EGMR, 03.11.2022 - 9487/19

  Nevertheless, whether a statement of a public official is in breach of the principle of the presumption of innocence must be determined in the context of the particular circumstances in which the impugned statement was made (see, inter alia, Adolf v. Austria, 26 March 1982, §§ 36-41, Series A no. 49, and Daktaras, cited above, § 41).

 
• EGMR, 03.09.2019 - 69717/14

  JANUSKEVICIENE v. LITHUANIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 03.11.2022 - 9487/19

  14590/15 and 25405/15, §§ 54-58, 22 January 2019; and Janu?.keviciene v. Lithuania, no. 69717/14, §§ 58-59, 3 September 2019).
• EGMR, 22.02.1984 - 8209/78

  Sutter ./. Schweiz

  Auszug aus EGMR, 03.11.2022 - 9487/19

  By rendering the administration of justice visible, publicity contributes to the achievement of the aim of Article 6 § 1, namely a fair trial, the guarantee of which is one of the fundamental principles of any democratic society, within the meaning of the Convention (see Sutter v. Switzerland, 22 February 1984, § 26, Series A no. 74, and Riepan v. Austria, no. 35115/97, § 27, ECHR 2000-XII).
• EGMR, 11.07.2017 - 19867/12

  MOREIRA FERREIRA v. PORTUGAL (No. 2)

  Auszug aus EGMR, 03.11.2022 - 9487/19

  While Article 6 guarantees the right to a fair hearing, it does not lay down any rules on the admissibility of evidence as such, which is primarily a matter for regulation under national law (see Schenk v. Switzerland, 12 July 1988, § 46, Series A no. 140; Jalloh v. Germany [GC], no. 54810/00, §§ 94-96, ECHR 2006-IX; and Moreira Ferreira v. Portugal (no. 2) [GC], no. 19867/12, § 83, 11 July 2017).
• EGMR, 12.07.1988 - 10862/84

  SCHENK c. SUISSE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 03.11.2022 - 9487/19

  While Article 6 guarantees the right to a fair hearing, it does not lay down any rules on the admissibility of evidence as such, which is primarily a matter for regulation under national law (see Schenk v. Switzerland, 12 July 1988, § 46, Series A no. 140; Jalloh v. Germany [GC], no. 54810/00, §§ 94-96, ECHR 2006-IX; and Moreira Ferreira v. Portugal (no. 2) [GC], no. 19867/12, § 83, 11 July 2017).
• EGMR, 22.01.2019 - 14590/15

  RINGWALD v. CROATIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 03.11.2022 - 9487/19

  14590/15 and 25405/15, §§ 54-58, 22 January 2019; and Janu?.keviciene v. Lithuania, no. 69717/14, §§ 58-59, 3 September 2019).
• EGMR, 14.11.2000 - 35115/97

  RIEPAN v. AUSTRIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 03.11.2022 - 9487/19

  By rendering the administration of justice visible, publicity contributes to the achievement of the aim of Article 6 § 1, namely a fair trial, the guarantee of which is one of the fundamental principles of any democratic society, within the meaning of the Convention (see Sutter v. Switzerland, 22 February 1984, § 26, Series A no. 74, and Riepan v. Austria, no. 35115/97, § 27, ECHR 2000-XII).
• EGMR, 22.04.2010 - 40984/07

  FATULLAYEV v. AZERBAIJAN

  Auszug aus EGMR, 03.11.2022 - 9487/19

  This means, amongst other things, that the Court must take realistic account not only of the existence of formal remedies in the legal system of the Contracting Party concerned, but also of the general context in which they operate, as well as the personal circumstances of the applicant (see Akdivar and Others v. Turkey, 16 September 1996, § 69, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996-IV, and Ilhan v. Turkey [GC], no. 22277/93, § 59, ECHR 2000-VII; see also Fatullayev v. Azerbaijan, no. 40984/07, § 151, 22 April 2010).
• EGMR, 27.02.1980 - 6903/75

  DEWEER c. BELGIQUE
• EGMR, 12.07.2013 - 25424/09

  ALLEN c. ROYAUME-UNI
• EGMR, 10.02.1995 - 15175/89

  ALLENET DE RIBEMONT c. FRANCE
• EGMR, 26.09.1995 - 18160/91

  DIENNET v. FRANCE
• EGMR, 11.07.2006 - 54810/00

  Einsatz von Brechmitteln; Selbstbelastungsfreiheit (Schutzbereich; faires …
• EGMR, 15.10.2013 - 34529/10

  GUTSANOVI c. BULGARIE
• EGMR, 01.03.2011 - 15924/05

  WELKE AND BIALEK v. POLAND
• EGMR, 25.03.1983 - 8660/79

  Minelli ./. Schweiz
• EGMR, 19.09.2006 - 23037/04

  MATIJASEVIC v. SERBIA

• EGMR, 19.12.2023 - 14139/21

  NARBUTAS v. LITHUANIA

  The Court notes that it has previously held that a civil-law remedy may, in principle, be an effective way of addressing a complaint relating to allegedly prejudicial statements made in respect of ongoing criminal proceedings, either alone or in combination with a criminal-law remedy (see Mamaladze v. Georgia, no. 9487/19, § 63, 3 November 2022, and the cases cited therein).
• EGMR, 10.10.2023 - 31634/18

  RIMSEVICS v. LATVIA

  In a number of other cases the Court has found that a civil-law remedy may, in principle, be an effective way of addressing a complaint relating to allegedly prejudicial statements made in respect of ongoing criminal proceedings, either alone or in combination with a criminal-law remedy (see Mamaladze v. Georgia, no. 9487/19, § 63, 3 November 2022, and Okropiridze v. Georgia, nos. 43627/16 and 71667/16, § 113, 7 September 2023).
• EGMR, 07.09.2023 - 43627/16

  OKROPIRIDZE v. GEORGIA

  As to the remaining elements of the applicant's relevant complaint, the Court notes that in its recent judgment in Mamaladze v. Georgia (no. 9487/19, 3 November 2022) it examined a similar objection by the Government (ibid., §§ 63-67) and noted, in so far as the statements of public officials were concerned, that the civil-law remedy could in principle provide adequate and sufficient redress to the applicant (ibid. at 65).
• EGMR, 26.09.2023 - 53488/15

  BECCHETTI AND OTHERS v. ALBANIA

  The Court recalls that the principle of the presumption of innocence is above all a procedural safeguard, and one of the elements of a fair criminal trial required by Article 6 § 1 (see Allenet de Ribemont v. France, 10 February 1995, § 35, Series A no. 308; Konstas v. Greece, no. 53466/07, § 29, 24 May 2011; and Mamaladze v. Georgia, no. 9487/19, § 63-65, 3 November 2022).
• EGMR - 5855/23 (anhängig)

  MAMALADZE v. GEORGIA (NO. 2)

  The application concerns the applicant's complaint that his telephone conversations with his representative were intercepted while proceedings in respect of his substantive complaints under the Convention (see Mamaladze v. Georgia, no. 9487/19, 3 November 2022) were pending before the Court.