Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  CICMANEC v. SLOVAKIA

  Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Constitutional proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing);Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Constitutional proceedings;Article 6-1 - Reasonable time) ...

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  CICMANEC v. SLOVAKIA

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 MRK
  [ENG]

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 28.06.2016 - 65302/11
• EGMR, 25.10.2017 - 65302/11

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Zitiert selbst (17)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 30979/96

  Auszug aus EGMR, 28.06.2016 - 65302/11

  The Court reiterates that the reasonableness of this period must be assessed in the light of the circumstances of the case and with reference to the following criteria: the complexity of the case, the conduct of the applicant and the relevant authorities, and what was at stake for the applicant in the dispute (see, among many other authorities, Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII).
• EGMR, 29.05.1986 - 9384/81

  Deumeland ./. Deutschland

  Auszug aus EGMR, 28.06.2016 - 65302/11

  At the same time, it notes that the applicability of the reasonable-time guarantee under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention to the proceedings before the Constitutional Court in the present case has not been questioned (see, for example, Oršuš and Others v. Croatia [GC], no. 15766/03, §§ 108 and 109, ECHR 2010; Süßmann v. Germany, 16 September 1996, § 41, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996-IV; and Deumeland v. Germany, 29 May 1986, § 77, Series A no. 100).
• EGMR, 07.01.2014 - 21666/09

  RINGIER AXEL SPRINGER SLOVAKIA, A.S. v. SLOVAKIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 28.06.2016 - 65302/11

  The Court considers that the claim for compensation in respect of the costs paid by the applicant under the contested judgment in principle falls to be examined under the heading of pecuniary damage (see, for example, Ringier Axel Springer Slovakia, a.s. v. Slovakia (no. 2), no. 21666/09, § 61, 7 January 2014, with a further reference).

• EGMR, 23.06.2009 - 22665/02

  LACZ v. POLAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 28.06.2016 - 65302/11

  In addition, irrespective of the specific means by which the applicant acquired title to the land, there is no indication that he could have obtained it in ignorance of the restrictions placed on the land or against his free will (see Łącz v. Poland (dec.), no. 22665/02, 23 June 2009; Šidlovská v. Slovakia (dec.), no. 73020/10, § 43, 5 November 2013; and Popivčák v. Slovakia (dec.), no. 8095/11, § 55, 5 November 2013).
• EGMR, 05.11.2013 - 8095/11

  POPIVCÁK v. SLOVAKIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 28.06.2016 - 65302/11

  In addition, irrespective of the specific means by which the applicant acquired title to the land, there is no indication that he could have obtained it in ignorance of the restrictions placed on the land or against his free will (see Łącz v. Poland (dec.), no. 22665/02, 23 June 2009; Šidlovská v. Slovakia (dec.), no. 73020/10, § 43, 5 November 2013; and Popivčák v. Slovakia (dec.), no. 8095/11, § 55, 5 November 2013).
• EGMR, 05.11.2013 - 73020/10

  SIDLOVSKÁ v. SLOVAKIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 28.06.2016 - 65302/11

  In addition, irrespective of the specific means by which the applicant acquired title to the land, there is no indication that he could have obtained it in ignorance of the restrictions placed on the land or against his free will (see Łącz v. Poland (dec.), no. 22665/02, 23 June 2009; Šidlovská v. Slovakia (dec.), no. 73020/10, § 43, 5 November 2013; and Popivčák v. Slovakia (dec.), no. 8095/11, § 55, 5 November 2013).
• EGMR, 21.01.1999 - 30544/96

  Auszug aus EGMR, 28.06.2016 - 65302/11

  Moreover, while Article 6 of the Convention guarantees the right to a fair hearing, it does not lay down any rules on the admissibility of evidence or the way it should be assessed, which are therefore primarily matters for regulation by national law and the national courts (see Garćia Ruiz v. Spain [GC], no. 30544/96, § 28, ECHR 1999-I, with further references).
• EGMR, 12.06.2012 - 30189/07

  ISTVAN AND ISTVANOVA v. SLOVAKIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 28.06.2016 - 65302/11

  The general case-law principles, as well as the existing case-law on exhaustion of domestic remedies in relation to complaints about length of proceedings in Slovakia, have been recapitulated in the Court's judgment in the case of Ištván and Ištvánová v. Slovakia (no. 30189/07, §§ 63-75, 12 June 2012, with further references).
• EGMR, 21.06.2005 - 61811/00

  MILATOVÁ AND OTHERS v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC

  Auszug aus EGMR, 28.06.2016 - 65302/11

  Accordingly, the Government argued that the respective courts' observations in reply to the applicant's complaint in the present case had not constituted reasoned opinions on the merits of his complaint, unlike in the cases of Milatová and Others v. the Czech Republic (no. 61811/00, § 65, ECHR 2005-V) and Juričić v. Croatia (no. 58222/09, § 74, 26 July 2011).
• EGMR, 24.02.2011 - 33908/04

  BENET PRAHA, SPOL. S R.O., v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC

  Auszug aus EGMR, 28.06.2016 - 65302/11

  The submissions in question were made by the defendant parties to the applicant's complaint and they were clearly aimed at influencing the Constitutional Court's assessment (see BENet Praha, spol. s r.o. v. the Czech Republic, no. 33908/04, § 142, 24 February 2011).
• EGMR, 21.03.2006 - 39765/04

  SALE c. FRANCE
• EGMR, 29.03.2011 - 17696/07

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 04.10.2011 - 35090/07

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 29.03.2005 - 51543/99

  MACKOVA v. SLOVAKIA
• EGMR, 03.03.2009 - 16970/05

  MAZUREK v. SLOVAKIA
• EGMR, 08.10.2013 - 16111/11

  FRIGO v. SLOVAKIA
• EGMR, 23.09.1997 - 22410/93

  ROBINS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen