Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  KUGLER v. AUSTRIA

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 41 MRK
  Violations of Art. 6-1 No violation of Art. 6-1 Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed Non-pecuniary damage - award (englisch)

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 27.11.2008 - 65631/01
• EGMR, 14.10.2010 - 65631/01
• EGMR, 24.04.2019 - 65631/01

Wird zitiert von ...Neu Zitiert selbst (3)

• EGMR, 27.10.1993 - 14448/88

  DOMBO BEHEER B.V. v. THE NETHERLANDS

  Auszug aus EGMR, 14.10.2010 - 65631/01

  The Court reiterates that the principle of equality of arms implies that each party must be afforded a reasonable opportunity to present his or her case - including evidence - under conditions that do not place him/her at a substantial disadvantage, vis-à-vis, his or her opponent (see Dombo Beheer B.V. v. the Netherlands, 27 October 1993, § 33, Series A no. 274).
• EGMR, 21.02.1990 - 11855/85

  H?KANSSON AND STURESSON v. SWEDEN

  Auszug aus EGMR, 14.10.2010 - 65631/01

  The applicant was therefore in principle entitled to an oral hearing before the Constitutional Court, because none of the exceptions laid down in the second sentence of Article 6 § 1 applied (see Håkansson and Sturesson v. Sweden, 21 February 1990, § 64, Series A no. 171-A).
• EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 30979/96

  FRYDLENDER c. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 14.10.2010 - 65631/01

  The Court reiterates that the reasonableness of the length of proceedings must be assessed in the light of the circumstances of the case and with reference to the following criteria: the complexity of the case, the conduct of the applicant and the relevant authorities (see, among many other authorities, Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII).

• EGMR, 28.02.2017 - 49664/12

  HAMBERGER v. AUSTRIA

  The Court has frequently found violations of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention in cases raising issues similar to the one in the present case (see Hackel v. Austria, no. 43463/09, §§ 18-21, 21 June 2016; Kugler v. Austria, no. 65631/01, §§ 39-42, 14 October 2010; Otto v. Austria, cited above, §§ 23-25; Strobel v. Austria, no. 25929/05, §§ 26-28, 4 June 2009; and Riepl v. Austria, no. 37040/02, §§ 37-42, 3 February 2005).