131: - Joined Cases C-159/91 and C-161/91 Poucet and Pistre, cited in note 55.132: - Joined Cases C-430/93 and C-431/93 Van Schijndel and Van Veen v SPF, cited in note 2.133: - Cited in note 56.134: - See above in paragraph 214.135: - Case C-41/90 Höfner, cited in note 53, paragraph 21 of the judgment; and Case C-55/96 Job Centre, cited in note 54, paragraph 21.136: - Case C-41/90 Höfner, cited in note 53.137: - Case 118/85 Commission v Italy [1987] ECR 2599, paragraphs 6 to 16 of the judgment; and Case C-387/93 Banchero [1995] ECR I-4663, paragraph 50.138: - Case C-343/95 Calì e Figli, cited in note 97.139: - Joined Cases 209/78 to 215/78 and 218/78 Van Landewyck, cited in note 105, paragraph 88 of the judgment; Opinion of Advocate General Lenz in Case C-415/93 Bosman, cited in note 21, paragraph 317.140: - Case 155/73 Sacchi [1974] ECR 409, paragraphs 13 and 14 of the judgment.

150: - Case 118/85 Commission v Italy, cited in note 136, paragraphs 7 and 8 of the judgment; and Case C-343/95 Calì e Figli, cited in note 97, paragraphs 16 and 17.151: - Case C-364/92 SAT Fluggesellschaft v Eurocontrol, cited in note 93, paragraph 30 of the judgment; Case C-343/95 Calì e Figli, cited in note 97, paragraphs 22 and 23.152: - Case C-41/90 Höfner and Elser, cited in note 53.153: - Joined Cases C-159/91 and C-161/91 Poucet and Pistre, cited in note 55.154: - Joined Cases C-430/93 and C-431/93 Van Schijndel and Van Veen v Stichting Pensioenfonds voor Fysiotherapeuten, cited in note 2, paragraphs 53 to 65 of the Opinion.

213: - Case 283/82 Duphar v Netherlands [1984] ECR 523, paragraph 16 of the judgment; Joined Cases C-159/91 and C-161/91 Poucet and Pistre, cited in note 55, paragraph 6; and Case C-70/95 Sodemare and Others v Regione Lombardia, cited in note 57, paragraph 27.214: - Case C-157/94 Commission v Netherlands, cited in note 209, paragraph 43 of the judgment.

131: - Joined Cases C-159/91 and C-161/91 Poucet and Pistre, cited in note 55.132: - Joined Cases C-430/93 and C-431/93 Van Schijndel and Van Veen v SPF, cited in note 2.133: - Cited in note 56.134: - See above in paragraph 214.135: - Case C-41/90 Höfner, cited in note 53, paragraph 21 of the judgment; and Case C-55/96 Job Centre, cited in note 54, paragraph 21.136: - Case C-41/90 Höfner, cited in note 53.137: - Case 118/85 Commission v Italy [1987] ECR 2599, paragraphs 6 to 16 of the judgment; and Case C-387/93 Banchero [1995] ECR I-4663, paragraph 50.138: - Case C-343/95 Calì e Figli, cited in note 97.139: - Joined Cases 209/78 to 215/78 and 218/78 Van Landewyck, cited in note 105, paragraph 88 of the judgment; Opinion of Advocate General Lenz in Case C-415/93 Bosman, cited in note 21, paragraph 317.140: - Case 155/73 Sacchi [1974] ECR 409, paragraphs 13 and 14 of the judgment.

150: - Case 118/85 Commission v Italy, cited in note 136, paragraphs 7 and 8 of the judgment; and Case C-343/95 Calì e Figli, cited in note 97, paragraphs 16 and 17.151: - Case C-364/92 SAT Fluggesellschaft v Eurocontrol, cited in note 93, paragraph 30 of the judgment; Case C-343/95 Calì e Figli, cited in note 97, paragraphs 22 and 23.152: - Case C-41/90 Höfner and Elser, cited in note 53.153: - Joined Cases C-159/91 and C-161/91 Poucet and Pistre, cited in note 55.154: - Joined Cases C-430/93 and C-431/93 Van Schijndel and Van Veen v Stichting Pensioenfonds voor Fysiotherapeuten, cited in note 2, paragraphs 53 to 65 of the Opinion.

213: - Case 283/82 Duphar v Netherlands [1984] ECR 523, paragraph 16 of the judgment; Joined Cases C-159/91 and C-161/91 Poucet and Pistre, cited in note 55, paragraph 6; and Case C-70/95 Sodemare and Others v Regione Lombardia, cited in note 57, paragraph 27.214: - Case C-157/94 Commission v Netherlands, cited in note 209, paragraph 43 of the judgment.

131: - Joined Cases C-159/91 and C-161/91 Poucet and Pistre, cited in note 55.132: - Joined Cases C-430/93 and C-431/93 Van Schijndel and Van Veen v SPF, cited in note 2.133: - Cited in note 56.134: - See above in paragraph 214.135: - Case C-41/90 Höfner, cited in note 53, paragraph 21 of the judgment; and Case C-55/96 Job Centre, cited in note 54, paragraph 21.136: - Case C-41/90 Höfner, cited in note 53.137: - Case 118/85 Commission v Italy [1987] ECR 2599, paragraphs 6 to 16 of the judgment; and Case C-387/93 Banchero [1995] ECR I-4663, paragraph 50.138: - Case C-343/95 Calì e Figli, cited in note 97.139: - Joined Cases 209/78 to 215/78 and 218/78 Van Landewyck, cited in note 105, paragraph 88 of the judgment; Opinion of Advocate General Lenz in Case C-415/93 Bosman, cited in note 21, paragraph 317.140: - Case 155/73 Sacchi [1974] ECR 409, paragraphs 13 and 14 of the judgment.

150: - Case 118/85 Commission v Italy, cited in note 136, paragraphs 7 and 8 of the judgment; and Case C-343/95 Calì e Figli, cited in note 97, paragraphs 16 and 17.151: - Case C-364/92 SAT Fluggesellschaft v Eurocontrol, cited in note 93, paragraph 30 of the judgment; Case C-343/95 Calì e Figli, cited in note 97, paragraphs 22 and 23.152: - Case C-41/90 Höfner and Elser, cited in note 53.153: - Joined Cases C-159/91 and C-161/91 Poucet and Pistre, cited in note 55.154: - Joined Cases C-430/93 and C-431/93 Van Schijndel and Van Veen v Stichting Pensioenfonds voor Fysiotherapeuten, cited in note 2, paragraphs 53 to 65 of the Opinion.

213: - Case 283/82 Duphar v Netherlands [1984] ECR 523, paragraph 16 of the judgment; Joined Cases C-159/91 and C-161/91 Poucet and Pistre, cited in note 55, paragraph 6; and Case C-70/95 Sodemare and Others v Regione Lombardia, cited in note 57, paragraph 27.214: - Case C-157/94 Commission v Netherlands, cited in note 209, paragraph 43 of the judgment.

4 Die Bundesrepublik Deutschland griff die Entscheidung TWD II nicht an; wohl aber hat die Klägerin mit Klageschrift, die am 19. Juni 1991 bei der Kanzlei des Gerichtshofes eingegangen ist, die unter der Nummer C-161/91 eingetragene Klage erhoben, mit der sie die Nichtigerklärung des Artikels 2 dieser Entscheidung beantragt.

8 Mit Beschluß vom 12. März 1993 sind die Rechtssachen C-161/91 (betreffend die Entscheidung TWD II) und C-110/92 und C-220/92 (betreffend die Entscheidung TWD III) zu gemeinsamem mündlichem Verfahren und zu gemeinsamer Entscheidung verbunden worden.

9 In Anwendung des Beschlusses 93/350/Euratom, EGKS, EWG des Rates vom 8. Juni 1993 zur Änderung des Beschlusses 88/591/EGKS, EWG, Euratom zur Errichtung eines Gerichts erster Instanz der Europäischen Gemeinschaften (…ABl. L 144, S. 21) hat der Gerichtshof mit Beschluß vom 15. September 1993 die Verbindung der Rechtssache C-110/92 (Deutschland/Kommission) mit den Rechtssachen C-161/91 und C-220/92 (TWD/Kommission) aufgehoben und mit Beschluß vom 27. September 1993 die verbundenen Rechtssachen C-161/91 und C-220/92 an das Gericht verwiesen.

131: - Joined Cases C-159/91 and C-161/91 Poucet and Pistre, cited in note 55.132: - Joined Cases C-430/93 and C-431/93 Van Schijndel and Van Veen v SPF, cited in note 2.133: - Cited in note 56.134: - See above in paragraph 214.135: - Case C-41/90 Höfner, cited in note 53, paragraph 21 of the judgment; and Case C-55/96 Job Centre, cited in note 54, paragraph 21.136: - Case C-41/90 Höfner, cited in note 53.137: - Case 118/85 Commission v Italy [1987] ECR 2599, paragraphs 6 to 16 of the judgment; and Case C-387/93 Banchero [1995] ECR I-4663, paragraph 50.138: - Case C-343/95 Calì e Figli, cited in note 97.139: - Joined Cases 209/78 to 215/78 and 218/78 Van Landewyck, cited in note 105, paragraph 88 of the judgment; Opinion of Advocate General Lenz in Case C-415/93 Bosman, cited in note 21, paragraph 317.140: - Case 155/73 Sacchi [1974] ECR 409, paragraphs 13 and 14 of the judgment.

150: - Case 118/85 Commission v Italy, cited in note 136, paragraphs 7 and 8 of the judgment; and Case C-343/95 Calì e Figli, cited in note 97, paragraphs 16 and 17.151: - Case C-364/92 SAT Fluggesellschaft v Eurocontrol, cited in note 93, paragraph 30 of the judgment; Case C-343/95 Calì e Figli, cited in note 97, paragraphs 22 and 23.152: - Case C-41/90 Höfner and Elser, cited in note 53.153: - Joined Cases C-159/91 and C-161/91 Poucet and Pistre, cited in note 55.154: - Joined Cases C-430/93 and C-431/93 Van Schijndel and Van Veen v Stichting Pensioenfonds voor Fysiotherapeuten, cited in note 2, paragraphs 53 to 65 of the Opinion.

213: - Case 283/82 Duphar v Netherlands [1984] ECR 523, paragraph 16 of the judgment; Joined Cases C-159/91 and C-161/91 Poucet and Pistre, cited in note 55, paragraph 6; and Case C-70/95 Sodemare and Others v Regione Lombardia, cited in note 57, paragraph 27.214: - Case C-157/94 Commission v Netherlands, cited in note 209, paragraph 43 of the judgment.