Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  GLOBA v. UKRAINE

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1 MRK
  Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings Article 6-1 - Reasonable time) (englisch)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (2)Zitiert selbst (6)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 06.04.2000 - 35382/97

  COMINGERSOLL S.A. v. PORTUGAL

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.07.2012 - 15729/07

  Lastly, the Court reiterates that enforcement proceedings by their very nature need to be dealt with expeditiously (see Comingersoll S.A. v. Portugal [GC], no. 35382/97, § 23, ECHR 2000-IV).
• EGMR, 06.12.2011 - 7097/10

  [ENG]

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.07.2012 - 15729/07

  Thus, the applicant would be put as far as possible in a situation equivalent to the one in which he would have been had there not been a breach of Article 6 of the Convention (see, mutatis mutandis, Gladysheva v. Russia, no. 7097/10, § 106).
• EGMR, 07.06.2005 - 71186/01

  FUKLEV v. UKRAINE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.07.2012 - 15729/07

  The State has an obligation to organise a system of enforcement of judgments that is effective both in law and in practice (see Fuklev v. Ukraine, no. 71186/01, § 84, 7 June 2005).

• EGMR, 22.05.2012 - 19/11

  LANG v. THE UNITED KINGDOM AND HASTIE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.07.2012 - 15729/07

  19/11/2012.
• EGMR, 18.11.2004 - 58255/00

  PROKOPOVICH v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.07.2012 - 15729/07

  Whether or not a particular premises constitutes a "home" which attracts the protection of Article 8 § 1 will depend on the factual circumstances, namely the existence of sufficient and continuous links with a specific place (see Buckley v. the United Kingdom, 25 September 1996, Reports 1996-IV, §§ 52-54, and Prokopovich v. Russia, no. 58255/00, § 36, ECHR 2004-XI (extracts)).
• EGMR, 05.10.2000 - 46934/99

  STRUNJAK ET AUTRES c. CROATIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.07.2012 - 15729/07

  The Court reiterates further that Article 8 of the Convention only protects a person's right to respect for his present home (see, for example, Strunjak and Others v. Croatia (dec.), no. 46934/99, ECHR 2000-X).

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 18.02.2014 - 60223/09

  GUSTOVARAC v. CROATIA

  Whether or not a particular premises constitutes a "home" which attracts the protection of Article 8 § 1 will depend on the factual circumstances, namely, the existence of sufficient and continuous links with a specific place (see Prokopovich v. Russia, no. 58255/00, § 36, ECHR 2004-XI (extracts); and Globa v. Ukraine, no. 15729/07, § 37, 5 July 2012).
• EGMR, 22.03.2016 - 74936/12

  PETOLAS v. CROATIA

  Whether or not particular premises constitute a "home" which attracts the protection of Article 8 § 1 will depend on factual circumstances, namely, the existence of sufficient and continuous links with a specific place (see Prokopovich v. Russia, no. 58255/00, § 36, ECHR 2004-XI (extracts), and Globa v. Ukraine, no. 15729/07, § 37, 5 July 2012).