Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  UGUZ c. TURQUIE

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1 MRK
  Violation de l'art. 6-1 (französisch)

Wird zitiert von ... (5)Zitiert selbst (4)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 26.10.2000 - 30210/96

  Ableitung einer allgemeinen Verpflichtung zur Entlassung eines …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 13.12.2007 - 31932/03

  En revanche, elle estime que le requérant a subi un tort moral certain du fait de la longueur de la procédure que ne compense pas suffisamment le constat de violation (voir, notamment, Kudla c. Pologne [GC], no 30210/96, § 165, CEDH 2000-XI, et Acunbay c. Turquie, nos 61442/00 et 61445/00, § 70, arrêt du 31 mai 2005).
• EGMR, 25.03.1999 - 25444/94

  Auszug aus EGMR, 13.12.2007 - 31932/03

  La Cour rappelle que le caractère raisonnable de la durée d'une procédure s'apprécie suivant les circonstances de la cause et eu égard aux critères consacrés par la jurisprudence de la Cour, en particulier la complexité de l'affaire, le comportement du requérant et celui des autorités compétentes (voir, parmi beaucoup d'autres, Pélissier et Sassi c. France [GC], no 25444/94, § 67, CEDH 1999-II).
• EGMR, 22.12.2005 - 23188/02

  TENDIK AND OTHERS v. TURKEY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 13.12.2007 - 31932/03

  La Cour rappelle avoir déjà eu l'occasion de constater que l'ordre juridique turc n'offrait pas aux justiciables un recours effectif au sens de l'article 13 de la Convention leur permettant de se plaindre de la durée d'une procédure (voir Tendik et autres c. Turquie, no 23188/02, § 36, 22 décembre 2005).
• EGMR, 31.05.2005 - 61442/00

  ACUNBAY c. TURQUIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 13.12.2007 - 31932/03

  En revanche, elle estime que le requérant a subi un tort moral certain du fait de la longueur de la procédure que ne compense pas suffisamment le constat de violation (voir, notamment, Kudla c. Pologne [GC], no 30210/96, § 165, CEDH 2000-XI, et Acunbay c. Turquie, nos 61442/00 et 61445/00, § 70, arrêt du 31 mai 2005).

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 10.02.2009 - 41957/04

  KHARITONASHVILI v. GEORGIA

  Furthermore, having regard to the fact that, according to the case file, the applicant's housing dispute is still pending before the domestic courts (see paragraphs 30 and 46 above), the Court considers that the most appropriate form of redress would consist in bringing its remainder to a conclusion as soon as possible, by administering the proceedings in accordance with all the requirements of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention (see, UÄŸuz v. Turkey, no. 31932/03, § 30, 13 December 2007).
• EGMR, 24.11.2009 - 45407/05

  HORVATH AND OTHERS v. HUNGARY

  Furthermore, having regard to the fact that the proceedings in question are still pending before the domestic courts, the Court considers that the most appropriate form of redress would be to bring them to a conclusion as soon as possible, by conducting them in accordance with the requirements of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention (see UÄŸuz v. Turkey, no. 31932/03, § 30, 13 December 2007).
• EGMR, 03.11.2009 - 5766/05

  SCHWARTZ AND OTHERS v. HUNGARY

  Furthermore, having regard to the fact that the proceedings in question are still pending before the domestic courts, the Court considers that the most appropriate form of redress would be to bring them to a conclusion as soon as possible, by conducting them in accordance with the requirements of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention (see, UÄŸuz v. Turkey, no. 31932/03, § 30, 13 December 2007).
• EGMR, 03.11.2009 - 25073/05

  SCHWARTZ v. HUNGARY

  Furthermore, having regard to the fact that the proceedings in question are still pending before the domestic courts, the Court considers that the most appropriate form of redress would be to bring them to a conclusion as soon as possible, by conducting them in accordance with the requirements of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention (see, UÄŸuz v. Turkey, no. 31932/03, § 30, 13 December 2007).
• EGMR, 03.03.2009 - 8782/02

  ALI KEMAL UGUR AND OTHERS v. TURKEY

  Furthermore, having regard to the fact that the proceedings in question are still pending before the domestic courts (see paragraph 15 above), the Court considers that the most appropriate form of redress would be to bring them to a conclusion as soon as possible, by conducting them in accordance with the requirements of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention (see, UÄŸuz v. Turkey, no. 31932/03, § 30, 13 December 2007).