Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  TUDOR-AUTO SRL AND TRIPLU-TUDOR SRL v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA

  Pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction) (englisch)

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 09.12.2008 - 36341/03
• EGMR, 09.02.2016 - 36341/03, 36344/03, 30346/05

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Zitiert selbst (3)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 06.04.2000 - 35382/97

  COMINGERSOLL S.A. v. PORTUGAL

  Auszug aus EGMR, 09.02.2016 - 36341/03

  The Court recalls its case-law according to which a legal person and commercial company may have sustained non-pecuniary damage that may be compensated under Article 41 of the Convention (see, for example, Comingersoll S.A. v. Portugal [GC], no. 35382/97, § 35, ECHR 2000-IV, and Sovtransavto Holding v. Ukraine (just satisfaction), no. 48553/99, § 79, 2 October 2003).
• EGMR, 16.10.2007 - 18726/04

  NADULISNEAC ION v. MOLDOVA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 09.02.2016 - 36341/03

  On that basis, the applicant companies argue that the Court should follow the approach it has taken in other cases against Moldova concerning the calculation of losses caused by late enforcement of final judgments (see, for instance, Prodan v. Moldova, no. 49806/99, § 73, ECHR 2004-III (extracts), Mizernaia, cited above, § 28, Nadulişneac v. Moldova, no. 18726/04, § 25, 16 October 2007).
• EGMR, 25.09.2007 - 31790/03

  MIZERNAIA v. MOLDOVA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 09.02.2016 - 36341/03

  After the entry into force of the new Civil Code on 12 June 2003 the domestic law provided for a specific method of calculating losses incurred as a result of delayed payments, described in Article 619 of the Civil Code (see, for instance, Mizernaia v. Moldova, no. 31790/03, §§ 14 and 28, 25 September 2007).

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen