Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 18.12.2007 - 3738/02 |
Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
MARINI v. ALBANIA
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 13, Art. 29, Art. 29 Abs. 3, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 Abs. 1, Art. 41 MRK
Preliminary objections joined to merits and dismisssed (non-exhaustion of domestic remedies lack of effective remedy in respect of the length-of-proceedings complaint) No violation of Art. 6-1 concerning the alleged restriction on the applicant's right of access ... - Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
MARINI c. ALBANIE
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 13, Art. 29, Art. 29 Abs. 3, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 Abs. 1, Art. 41 MRK
Exceptions préliminaires jointes au fond et rejetées Violations de l'art. 6-1 Non-violation de l'art. 6-1 Violation de l'art. 13 Non-lieu à examiner les autres griefs sous l'art. 6 Violation de P1-1 Partiellement irrecevable Dommage matériel et préjudice moral ...
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 18.12.2007 - 3738/02
- EGMR, 08.12.2016 - 3738/02
Wird zitiert von ... Zitiert selbst (18)
- EGMR, 26.10.2000 - 30210/96
Ableitung einer allgemeinen Verpflichtung zur Entlassung eines …
Auszug aus EGMR, 18.12.2007 - 3738/02
As to the applicant's complaint concerning the lack of a remedy in respect of the excessive length of the proceedings, the Court reiterates that Article 13 guarantees an effective remedy before a national authority for the alleged breach of the requirement under Article 6 § 1 to hear a case within a reasonable time (see Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, § 156, ECHR 2000-XI). - EGMR, 21.02.1975 - 4451/70
Auszug aus EGMR, 18.12.2007 - 3738/02
In this way it embodies the "right to a court", of which the right of access, that is the right to institute proceedings before courts in civil matters, constitutes one aspect (see Golder v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 21 February 1975, Series A no. 18, pp. 17-18, §§ 35-36). - EGMR, 09.10.1979 - 6289/73
Auszug aus EGMR, 18.12.2007 - 3738/02
In such circumstances, the State cannot simply remain passive and "there is no room to distinguish between acts and omissions" (see, mutatis mutandis, Airey v. Ireland, judgment of 9 October 1979, Series A no. 32, p. 14, § 25).
- EGMR, 09.12.1994 - 16798/90
Auszug aus EGMR, 18.12.2007 - 3738/02
As regards the right guaranteed by Article 1 of Protocol No. 1, those positive obligations may entail certain measures necessary to protect the right of property (see, among other authorities and mutatis mutandis, López Ostra v. Spain, judgment of 9 December 1994, Series A no. 303-C, p. 55, § 55), even in cases involving litigation between individuals or companies. - EGMR, 17.01.1970 - 2689/65
Auszug aus EGMR, 18.12.2007 - 3738/02
Nevertheless, a State which does institute such courts is required to ensure that persons amenable to the law shall enjoy before these courts the fundamental guarantees contained in Article 6 (see, among other authorities, Delcourt v. Belgium, judgment of 17 January 1970, Series A no. 11, p. 14, § 25). - EGMR, 21.02.1990 - 9310/81
POWELL ET RAYNER c. ROYAUME-UNI
Auszug aus EGMR, 18.12.2007 - 3738/02
46-47, § 81, and Powell and Rayner v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 21 February 1990, Series A no. 172, pp. - EGMR, 28.05.1985 - 8225/78
Auszug aus EGMR, 18.12.2007 - 3738/02
It is subject to limitations permitted by implication, in particular where the conditions of admissibility of an appeal are concerned, since by its very nature it calls for regulation by the State, which enjoys a certain margin of appreciation in this regard (see, Ashingdane v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 28 May 1985, Series A no. 93, pp. 24-25, § 57). - EGMR, 06.04.2000 - 35382/97
COMINGERSOLL S.A. v. PORTUGAL
Auszug aus EGMR, 18.12.2007 - 3738/02
The Court reiterates that the "reasonableness" of the length of proceedings must be assessed in the light of the circumstances of the case and with reference to the following criteria: the complexity of the case, the conduct of the applicant and of the relevant authorities and what was at stake for the applicant in the dispute (see, among other authorities, Comingersoll S.A. v. Portugal [GC], no. 35382/97, § 19, ECHR 2000-IV). - EGMR, 27.04.1988 - 9659/82
Auszug aus EGMR, 18.12.2007 - 3738/02
The Court reiterates that Article 13 applies only where an individual has an "arguable claim" to be the victim of a violation of a Convention right (see Boyle and Rice v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 27 April 1988, Series A no. 131, p. 23, § 52). - EGMR, 17.07.2003 - 32190/96
Auszug aus EGMR, 18.12.2007 - 3738/02
The Court will go on to examine whether the consequences suffered by the applicant were proportionate to the legitimate aim pursued (see, mutatis mutandis, Luordo v. Italy, no. 32190/96, § 86, ECHR 2003-IX). - EGMR, 25.11.2003 - 41431/98
WIERCISZEWSKA v. POLAND
- EGMR, 22.05.1984 - 8805/79
- EGMR, 26.07.2001 - 51585/99
HORVAT v. CROATIA
- EGMR, 20.11.1995 - 19589/92
BRITISH-AMERICAN TOBACCO COMPANY LTD c. PAYS-BAS
- EGMR, 22.08.2006 - 7352/03
BESHIRI AND OTHERS v. ALBANIA
- EKMR, 11.12.1986 - 11189/84
SOCIETE S. ET T. c. SUEDE
- EGMR, 06.04.2006 - 75817/01
HUSEINOVIC v. SLOVENIA
- EGMR, 01.07.1961 - 332/57
- EGMR, 02.07.2009 - 1152/03
DIMITAR YANAKIEV c. BULGARIE
Compte tenu des motifs l'ayant amenée à constater la violation de l'article 6 § 1, la Cour estime qu'il n'y a pas lieu d'examiner séparément le grief tiré de l'article 13 de la Convention (voir Marini c. Albanie, no 3738/02, § 151, CEDH 2007-... (extraits)).
Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um diese Funktion zu nutzen. Falls Sie noch kein Benutzerkonto haben, können Sie sich in weniger als einer Minute eines kostenlos anlegen "Registrieren".