Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  SOSTARIC v. CROATIA

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1 MRK
  Violation of Art. 6-1 (englisch)

Wird zitiert von ... (2)Zitiert selbst (10)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 30979/96

  Auszug aus EGMR, 12.04.2007 - 39659/04

  The reasonableness of the length of proceedings must be assessed in the light of the circumstances of the case and with reference to the following criteria: the complexity of the case, the conduct of the applicant and the relevant authorities and what was at stake for the applicant in the dispute (see, among many other authorities, Cocchiarella v. Italy [GC], no. 64886/01, § 68, to be published in ECHR 2006; and Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII).
• EGMR, 06.04.2000 - 35382/97

  COMINGERSOLL S.A. v. PORTUGAL

  Auszug aus EGMR, 12.04.2007 - 39659/04

  The Court reiterates that enforcement proceedings by their very nature need to be dealt with expeditiously (see Comingersoll S.A. v. Portugal [GC], no. 35382/97, § 23, ECHR 2000-IV).
• EGMR, 07.06.2005 - 71186/01

  FUKLEV v. UKRAINE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 12.04.2007 - 39659/04

  The Court reiterates that the State has an obligation to organise a system of enforcement of judgments that is effective both in law and in practice and ensures their enforcement without any undue delay (see Fuklev v. Ukraine, no. 71186/01, § 84, 7 June 2005).

• EGMR, 05.09.2002 - 77784/01

  NOGOLICA c. CROATIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 12.04.2007 - 39659/04

  This rule is subject to exceptions which may be justified by the specific circumstances of each case (see Nogolica v. Croatia (dec.), no. 77784/01, ECHR 2002-VIII).
• EGMR, 04.07.2002 - 20862/02

  SLAVICEK contre la CROATIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 12.04.2007 - 39659/04

  The Court recalls that as of 22 March 2002 a constitutional complaint under section 63 of the Constitutional Court Act is considered an effective remedy in respect of the length of proceedings still pending in Croatia (see Slavicek v. Croatia (dec.), no. 20862/02, ECHR 2002-VII).
• EGMR, 15.12.2005 - 35030/04

  KARADZIC v. CROATIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 12.04.2007 - 39659/04

  The subsequent developments in the Constitutional Court's case-law showed that only as of 2 February 2005 did a constitutional complaint become an effective remedy for the length of enforcement proceedings (see Karadzic v. Croatia, no. 35030/04, § 38, 15 December 2005).
• EGMR, 15.11.2005 - 58707/00

  POLACIK v. SLOVAKIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 12.04.2007 - 39659/04

  The Court has frequently found violations of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention in cases raising issues similar to the one in the present case (see, for example, Polácik v. Slovakia, no. 58707/00, 15 November 2005; Heger v. Slovakia, no. 62194/00, 17 May 2005; and Estima Jorge v. Portugal, judgment of 21 April 1998, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998-II).
• EGMR, 08.07.2020 - 71549/01

  CVIJETIC CONTRE LA CROATIE ET 1 AUTRE AFFAIRE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 12.04.2007 - 39659/04

  However, at that time it was not clear whether the new remedy would at all apply to the length of enforcement proceedings (see Pibernik v. Croatia (dec.), no. 75139/01, 4 September 2003).
• EGMR, 17.05.2005 - 62194/00

  HEGER v. SLOVAKIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 12.04.2007 - 39659/04

  The Court has frequently found violations of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention in cases raising issues similar to the one in the present case (see, for example, Polácik v. Slovakia, no. 58707/00, 15 November 2005; Heger v. Slovakia, no. 62194/00, 17 May 2005; and Estima Jorge v. Portugal, judgment of 21 April 1998, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998-II).
• EGMR, 07.12.2006 - 14898/04

  SAMIJA v. CROATIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 12.04.2007 - 39659/04

  As to a possible departure from the general rule of non-exhaustion, the Court does not find any special circumstances which would justify making an exception to that rule in the present case (see Macinkovic v. Croatia, no. 29759/04, § 29, 7 December 2006; Samija v. Croatia, no. 14898/04, § 31, 7 December 2006).

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 15.03.2018 - 29759/04

  MACINKOVIC CONTRE LA CROATIE ET 6 AUTRES AFFAIRES

  39659/04.
• EGMR, 04.06.2013 - 58258/09

  [ENG]

  The Court does not discern any causal link between the violation found and the pecuniary damage alleged; it therefore rejects this claim (see, mutatis mutandis, Sostaric v. Croatia, no. 39659/04, §§ 39-41, 12 April 2007).