Neue Kooperation: dejure.org × Doctrine bringen KI-Power für Aktenanalyse, Recherche und Texterstellung. Doctrine entdecken
×

Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 18.12.2003 - 42775/98   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/2003,39395
EGMR, 18.12.2003 - 42775/98 (https://dejure.org/2003,39395)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 18.12.2003 - 42775/98 (https://dejure.org/2003,39395)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 18. Dezember 2003 - 42775/98 (https://dejure.org/2003,39395)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2003,39395) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichung

  • Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

    UKUNC AND GUNES v. TURKEY

    Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 6 Abs. 3 Buchst. c, Art. 41 MRK
    Violation of Art. 6-1 Not necessary to examine Art. 6-3-c Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed Non-pecuniary damage - finding of violation sufficient Costs and expenses partial award - Convention proceedings (englisch)

Verfahrensgang

 
Sortierung



Kontextvorschau





Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (15)Zitiert selbst (1)

  • EGMR, 01.10.2002 - 37645/97

    SAWICKA v. POLAND

    Auszug aus EGMR, 18.12.2003 - 42775/98
    The Court will make an award in respect of costs and expenses in so far as these were actually and necessarily incurred and were reasonable as to quantum (see, as a recent authority, Sawicka v. Poland, no. 37645/97, § 54, 1 October 2002).
  • EGMR, 23.05.2006 - 44785/98

    KIPER v. TURKEY

    Having regard to its finding of a violation of the applicant's right to a fair hearing by an independent and impartial tribunal, the Court considers that it is not necessary to examine the other complaint under Article 6 of the Convention relating to the fairness of the proceedings before the domestic courts (see, among other authorities, İncal, cited above, § 74, and Ükünç and Günes v. Turkey, no. 42775/98, § 26, 18 December 2003).
  • EGMR, 10.01.2006 - 57345/00

    BUDAK AND OTHERS v. TURKEY

    Having regard to its finding of a violation of applicants' right to a fair hearing by an independent and impartial tribunal, the Court considers that it is not necessary to examine the other complaints under Article 6 of the Convention relating to the fairness of the proceedings before the domestic courts (see, among other authorities, Incal, cited above, § 74 and Ükünç and Güneş v. Turkey, no. 42775/98, § 26, 18 December 2003).
  • EGMR, 29.11.2007 - 65942/01

    MUSTAFA KARATEPE v. TURKEY

    Having regard to its finding of a violation of the applicant's right to a fair hearing by an independent and impartial tribunal, the Court considers that it is not necessary to examine the other complaints under Article 6 of the Convention relating to the fairness of the proceedings (see, among other authorities, Ükünç and Günes v. Turkey, no. 42775/98, § 26, 18 December 2003).
  • EGMR, 02.10.2007 - 75573/01

    ÇELIKER v. TURKEY

    Having regard to its finding of a violation of the applicant's right to a fair hearing by an independent and impartial tribunal, the Court considers that it is not necessary to examine the other complaints under Article 6 of the Convention relating to the fairness of the proceedings (see, among other authorities, Ükünç and Günes v. Turkey, no. 42775/98, § 26, 18 December 2003).
  • EGMR, 15.02.2007 - 70317/01

    CANSEVEN v. TURKEY

    Having regard to its finding of a violation of the applicant's right to a fair hearing by an independent and impartial tribunal, the Court considers that it is not necessary to examine the other complaints under Article 6 of the Convention relating to the fairness of the proceedings (see, among other authorities, Incal v. Turkey, judgment of 9 June 1998, Reports 1998-IV, p. 1573, § 74, and Ükünç and Günes v. Turkey, no. 42775/98, § 26, 18 December 2003).
  • EGMR, 05.12.2006 - 58055/00

    ASLAN AND SANCI v. TURKEY

    Having regard to its finding of a violation of the applicant's right to a fair hearing by an independent and impartial tribunal, the Court considers that it is not necessary to examine the other complaints under Article 6 of the Convention relating to the fairness of the proceedings (see, among other authorities, Ükünç and Günes v. Turkey, no. 42775/98, § 26, 18 December 2003).
  • EGMR, 31.10.2006 - 60161/00

    KARAOGLAN v. TURKEY

    Having regard to its finding of a violation of the applicant's right to a fair hearing by an independent and impartial tribunal, the Court considers that it is not necessary to examine the other complaints under Article 6 of the Convention relating to the fairness of the proceedings before it (see, among other authorities, Incal v. Turkey, judgment of 9 June 1998, Reports 1998-IV, p. 1573, § 74, and Ükünç and Günes v. Turkey, no. 42775/98, § 26, 18 December 2003).
  • EGMR, 31.10.2006 - 1827/02

    GÜRSOY ET AUTRES c. TURQUIE

    Eu égard au constat de violation du droit des requérants à voir leur cause entendue par un tribunal indépendant et impartial, la Cour estime qu'il n'y a pas lieu d'examiner le grief déduit de la violation à un procès équitable (voir, entres autres, Çıraklar c. Turquie, arrêt du 28 octobre 1998, Recueil 1998-VII, p. 3074, §§ 44-45, İncal, précité, § 74 et Günes c. Turquie, no 42775/98, § 26, 18 décembre 2003).
  • EGMR, 11.04.2006 - 52782/99

    ERÇIKDI AND OTHERS v. TURKEY

    Having regard to its finding of a violation of applicants" right to a fair hearing by an independent and impartial tribunal, the Court considers that it is not necessary to examine the other complaints under Article 6 of the Convention relating to the fairness of the proceedings before the domestic courts (see, among other authorities, İncal, cited above, § 74 and Ükünç and Günes v. Turkey, no. 42775/98, § 26, 18 December 2003).
  • EGMR, 31.01.2006 - 53047/99

    BIRDAL v. TURKEY

    Moreover, it cannot be said that the applicant's detention was not in conformity with the purposes of the deprivation of liberty permitted by Article 5 § 1 (a), so as to be arbitrary (see Volkan Ükünç and Deniz Günes v. Turkey (dec.), no. 42775/98, 5 December 2000).
  • EGMR, 24.01.2006 - 58058/00

    KEZER AND OTHERS v. TURKEY

  • EGMR, 14.04.2005 - 48095/99

    TÖRE v. TURKEY

  • EGMR, 06.05.2004 - 34400/02

    SAHIN v. TURKEY

  • EGMR, 16.05.2017 - 11318/10

    BASTÜRK v. TURKEY

  • EGMR, 03.05.2007 - 62018/00

    MEHMET SERIF ASLAN c. TURQUIE

Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
dejure.org Übersicht EGMR
dejure.org nutzen ohne Ablenkung
Werbung abschalten. Jetzt buchen! Keine automatische Verlängerung.
Info zum PUR-Angebot
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht