Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 10.11.2004 - 62361/00 |
Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
RICCARDI PIZZATI v. ITALY
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 1, Art. 41 MRK
Preliminary objection rejected (non-exhaustion of domestic remedies) Violation of Art. 6-1 Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed Non-pecuniary damage - financial award Costs and expenses (national proceedings) - claim dismissed (englisch) - Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
RICCARDI PIZZATI c. ITALIE
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 1, Art. 41 MRK
Exception préliminaire rejetée (non-épuisement des voies de recours internes) Violation de l'art. 6-1 Dommage matériel - demande rejetée Préjudice moral - réparation pécuniaire Frais et dépens (procédure nationale) - demande rejetée (französisch)
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 22.01.2004 - 62361/00
- EGMR, 10.11.2004 - 62361/00
- EGMR, 29.03.2006 - 62361/00
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Zitiert selbst (3)
- EGMR, 06.04.2000 - 35382/97
COMINGERSOLL S.A. v. PORTUGAL
Auszug aus EGMR, 10.11.2004 - 62361/00
In addition, if one or more heads of damage cannot be calculated precisely or if the distinction between pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage proves difficult, the Court may decide to make a global assessment (see Comingersoll v. Portugal [GC], no. 35382/97, § 29, ECHR 2000-IV). - EGMR, 28.07.1999 - 34884/97
Auszug aus EGMR, 10.11.2004 - 62361/00
The Court reiterates its previous finding in many judgments (see, for example, Bottazzi v. Italy [GC], no. 34884/97, § 22, ECHR 1999-V) that in Italy there is a practice incompatible with the Convention resulting from an accumulation of breaches of the "reasonable-time" requirement. - EGMR, 24.06.2004 - 56079/00
DI SANTE contre l'ITALIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 10.11.2004 - 62361/00
The Court also reiterates its previous finding that it was reasonable to assume that after 26 July 2004 the public could no longer have been unaware of the Court of Cassation's new precedent, particularly its judgment no. 1340, and that it was from that date onwards that applicants had to be required to use that remedy for the purposes of Article 35 § 1 of the Convention (see Di Sante v. Italy (dec.), no. 56079/00, 24 June 2004).
Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um diese Funktion zu nutzen. Falls Sie noch kein Benutzerkonto haben, können Sie sich in weniger als einer Minute eines kostenlos anlegen "Registrieren".