Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  KOLOVANGINA v. RUSSIA

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 29, Art. 29 Abs. 3, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 Abs. 1 MRK
  Remainder inadmissible No violation of Art. 6-1 (englisch)

Wird zitiert von ... (2)Zitiert selbst (6)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 21.02.1975 - 4451/70

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.12.2008 - 76593/01

  The Court reiterates that the right to a court, of which the right of access constitutes one aspect, is inherent in the right stated by Article 6 § 1 of the Convention (see Golder v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 21 February 1975, Series A no. 18, p. 18, § 36).
• EGMR, 28.05.1985 - 8225/78

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.12.2008 - 76593/01

  This right of access is not absolute but may be subject to limitations permitted by implication (see Ashingdane v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 28 May 1985, Series A no. 93, p. 24-25, § 57).
• EGMR, 21.09.1994 - 17101/90

  FAYED c. ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.12.2008 - 76593/01

  They must pursue a legitimate aim and there must be a reasonable relationship of proportionality between the means employed and the aim sought to be achieved (see, among other authorities, Khalfaoui v. France, no. 34791/97, § 35, ECHR 1999-IX; Fayed v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 21 September 1994, Series A no. 294-B, pp.

• EGMR, 04.12.1995 - 23805/94

  BELLET c. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.12.2008 - 76593/01

  49-50, § 65; and Bellet v. France, judgment of 4 December 1995, Series A no. 333-B, p. 41, § 31).
• EGMR, 14.12.1999 - 34791/97

  KHALFAOUI c. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.12.2008 - 76593/01

  They must pursue a legitimate aim and there must be a reasonable relationship of proportionality between the means employed and the aim sought to be achieved (see, among other authorities, Khalfaoui v. France, no. 34791/97, § 35, ECHR 1999-IX; Fayed v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 21 September 1994, Series A no. 294-B, pp.
• EGMR, 15.10.2002 - 55782/00

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.12.2008 - 76593/01

  Neither did she argue that she was in any manner prevented from seeking professional legal advice at the time when she wished to issue the proceedings (see, mutatis mutandis, Cañete de Goñi v. Spain, no. 55782/00, § 41, ECHR 2002-VIII).

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 31.10.2017 - 8460/10

  GASYMOV v. RUSSIA

  The Court's role is confined to ascertaining whether the effects of such an interpretation are compatible with the Convention (see Kolovangina v. Russia, no. 76593/01, § 23, 11 December 2008).
• EGMR, 13.12.2011 - 13703/04

  [ENG]

  However, the Court considers that this possibility does not attenuate the limitation on the right of access to court in the present case, since the underlying problem resided in the applicable legislation (see, by way of comparison, Kolovangina v. Russia, no. 76593/01, § 26, 11 December 2008).