Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  VIDOVIC v. SLOVENIA

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 13, Art. 29, Art. 29 Abs. 3, Art. 41 MRK
  Violation of Art. 6-1 Violation of Art. 13 Non-pecuniary damage - financial award Costs and expenses partial award - Convention proceedings (englisch)

Wird zitiert von ... (2)Zitiert selbst (2)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 26.10.2000 - 30210/96

  Ableitung einer allgemeinen Verpflichtung zur Entlassung eines …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 09.03.2006 - 77512/01

  The Court reiterates that Article 13 guarantees an effective remedy before a national authority for an alleged breach of the requirement under Article 6 § 1 to hear a case within a reasonable time (see Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, § 156, ECHR 2000-XI).
• EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 30979/96

  Auszug aus EGMR, 09.03.2006 - 77512/01

  The Court reiterates that the reasonableness of the length of proceedings must be assessed in the light of the circumstances of the case and with reference to the following criteria: the complexity of the case, the conduct of the applicant and the relevant authorities and what was at stake for the applicant in the dispute (see, among many other authorities, Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII).

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 08.12.2016 - 23032/02

  LUKENDA AND 263 OTHER CASES AGAINST SLOVENIA

  77512/01.
• EGMR, 19.10.2010 - 20965/03

  [ENG]

  In the circumstances of the present case and in the light of the criteria laid down in its case-law (see, for example, Vidovic v. Slovenia, no. 77512/01, §§ 16-18, 9 March 2006; Cvetreznik v. Slovenia, no. 75653/01, §§ 16-18, 30 March 2006; Pazon v. Slovenia, no. 17337/02, §§ 16-18, 6 April 2006) the Court considers that length of the proceedings was excessive and failed to meet the "reasonable time" requirement.