Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 01.03.2022 - 43277/20, 49994/20, 50514/20, 51079/20, 54383/20 |
Zitiervorschläge
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 01.03.2022 - 43277/20, 49994/20, 50514/20, 51079/20, 54383/20 (https://dejure.org/2022,3704)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 01. März 2022 - 43277/20, 49994/20, 50514/20, 51079/20, 54383/20 (https://dejure.org/2022,3704)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2022,3704) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
EINIKIS AND OTHERS v. LITHUANIA
Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment) (Substantive aspect) (englisch)
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (9)
- VK Baden-Württemberg, 04.05.2011 - 1 VK 15/11
Der verantwortliche Entscheidungsträger muss sich ermitteln lassen!
Auszug aus EGMR, 01.03.2022 - 43277/20
16/11/2020. - KAG Mainz, 26.06.2012 - M 21/11
Eingruppierung; Zustimmungsersetzung
Auszug aus EGMR, 01.03.2022 - 43277/20
21/11/2020. - EGMR, 10.01.2012 - 42525/07
ANANYEV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 01.03.2022 - 43277/20
The general principles concerning conditions of detention, particularly with regard to the partitioning of sanitary facilities, have been summarised in Ananyev and Others v. Russia (nos. 42525/07 and 60800/08, § 149, 10 January 2012) and Mursic v. Croatia ([GC], no. 7334/13, § 106, 20 October 2016).
- EGMR, 21.10.2020 - 73786/01
CENBAUER CONTRE LA CROATIE ET 3 AUTRES AFFAIRES
Auszug aus EGMR, 01.03.2022 - 43277/20
The general principles concerning conditions of detention, particularly with regard to the partitioning of sanitary facilities, have been summarised in Ananyev and Others v. Russia (nos. 42525/07 and 60800/08, § 149, 10 January 2012) and Mursic v. Croatia ([GC], no. 7334/13, § 106, 20 October 2016). - EGMR, 08.12.2015 - 40828/12
MIRONOVAS AND OTHERS v. LITHUANIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 01.03.2022 - 43277/20
Accordingly, the Court finds that the five applicants retain their victim status under Article 34 of the Convention (see Mironovas and Others v. Lithuania, nos. 40828/12 and 6 others, §§ 99-100, 8 December 2015). - EGMR, 18.12.2018 - 25988/16
VISNIAKOVAS v. LITHUANIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 01.03.2022 - 43277/20
In several cases concerning Lukiskes Remand Prison, the Court, relying on reports issued by the European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (CPT), found a violation of Article 3 of the Convention on account of the fact that, in addition to the inadequate partitioning of sanitary facilities, the applicants had been locked up in their cells for twenty-three hours a day and had not been able to freely move around the prison during the day (see Oskirko v. Lithuania [Committee], no. 14411/16, §§ 44-45, 25 September 2018; Visniakovas v. Lithuania [Committee], no. 25988/16, §§ 31-33, 18 December 2018; and Steponavicius v. Lithuania [Committee], no. 6982/18, §§ 18-19, 17 December 2019). - EGMR, 17.12.2019 - 6982/18
STEPONAVICIUS v. LITHUANIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 01.03.2022 - 43277/20
In several cases concerning Lukiskes Remand Prison, the Court, relying on reports issued by the European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (CPT), found a violation of Article 3 of the Convention on account of the fact that, in addition to the inadequate partitioning of sanitary facilities, the applicants had been locked up in their cells for twenty-three hours a day and had not been able to freely move around the prison during the day (see Oskirko v. Lithuania [Committee], no. 14411/16, §§ 44-45, 25 September 2018; Visniakovas v. Lithuania [Committee], no. 25988/16, §§ 31-33, 18 December 2018; and Steponavicius v. Lithuania [Committee], no. 6982/18, §§ 18-19, 17 December 2019). - EGMR, 25.09.2018 - 14411/16
OSKIRKO v. LITHUANIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 01.03.2022 - 43277/20
In several cases concerning Lukiskes Remand Prison, the Court, relying on reports issued by the European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (CPT), found a violation of Article 3 of the Convention on account of the fact that, in addition to the inadequate partitioning of sanitary facilities, the applicants had been locked up in their cells for twenty-three hours a day and had not been able to freely move around the prison during the day (see Oskirko v. Lithuania [Committee], no. 14411/16, §§ 44-45, 25 September 2018; Visniakovas v. Lithuania [Committee], no. 25988/16, §§ 31-33, 18 December 2018; and Steponavicius v. Lithuania [Committee], no. 6982/18, §§ 18-19, 17 December 2019). - EGMR, 26.11.2019 - 34179/18
MICHNO AND DIMBINSKAS v. LITHUANIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 01.03.2022 - 43277/20
34179/18 and 35033/18, §§ 20 and 26, 26 November 2019).