Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 01.09.2020 - 11599/14, 11602/14 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2020,24643) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
C.A. ZRT. AND T.R. v. HUNGARY
Violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Protection of property (Article 1 para. 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Peaceful enjoyment of possessions) (englisch)
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
C. A. ZRT. v. HUNGARY
Art. 13, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 MRK
[ENG]
Wird zitiert von ... Neu Zitiert selbst (3)
- EGMR, 29.04.1999 - 25088/94
CHASSAGNOU ET AUTRES c. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 01.09.2020 - 11599/14
In determining whether this requirement is met, the Court recognises that the State enjoys a wide margin of appreciation with regard both to choosing the means of enforcement and to ascertaining whether the consequences of enforcement are justified in the general interest for the purpose of achieving the object of the law in question (see Chassagnou and Others v. France [GC], nos. 25088/94 and 2 others, § 75 ECHR 1999-III). - EGMR, 20.11.1995 - 17849/91
PRESSOS COMPANIA NAVIERA S.A. ET AUTRES c. BELGIQUE
Auszug aus EGMR, 01.09.2020 - 11599/14
In particular, there must be a reasonable relationship of proportionality between the means employed and the aim sought to be realised by any measure depriving a person of his possessions (see Pressos Compania Naviera S.A. and Others v. Belgium, 20 November 1995, § 38, Series A no. 332; Former King of Greece and Others v. Greece [GC], no. 25701/94, §§ 89-90, ECHR 2000-XII,; and Scordino v. Italy (no. 1) [GC], no. 36813/97, § 93, ECHR 2006-V). - EGMR, 31.01.1986 - 8734/79
BARTHOLD v. GERMANY (ARTICLE 50)
Auszug aus EGMR, 01.09.2020 - 11599/14
However, Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 does not guarantee the right to full compensation in all circumstances (see James and Others v. the United Kingdom, 21 February 1986, § 54, Series A no. 98, and Broniowski v. Poland [GC], no. 31443/96, § 182, ECHR 2004-V).
- EGMR, 06.12.2022 - 39859/14
PANNON PLAKÁT KFT AND OTHERS v. HUNGARY
11599/14 and 11602/14, § 36, 1 September 2020, where progressively more restrictive legislation over a long period foreshadowed the possibility of a ban).