Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  LOPUSHANSKYY v. UKRAINE

  Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing;Equality of arms) (englisch)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  LOPUSHANSKYY v. UKRAINE

  Art. 3, Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 1, Art. 5 Abs. 5, Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1 MRK
  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (2)Neu Zitiert selbst (3)

• EGMR, 17.01.2012 - 36760/06

  STANEV c. BULGARIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 02.02.2017 - 27793/08

  The Court reiterates that Article 5 § 5 of the Convention is complied with where it is possible to apply for compensation in respect of a deprivation of liberty effected in conditions contrary to paragraphs 1, 2, 3 or 4 (see Stanev v. Bulgaria [GC], no. 36760/06, § 182, ECHR 2012, with further references).
• EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 22277/93

  ILHAN c. TURQUIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 02.02.2017 - 27793/08

  At the same time, the Court has consistently held that the rule of exhaustion is neither absolute nor capable of being applied automatically; for the purposes of reviewing whether it has been observed, it is essential to have regard to the circumstances of the individual case (see Ilhan v. Turkey [GC], no. 22277/93, § 59, ECHR 2000-VII).
• EGMR, 17.12.2009 - 20075/03

  SHILBERGS v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 02.02.2017 - 27793/08

  The Court reiterates in this connection that the question whether the applicant received reparation for the damage caused - comparable to just satisfaction as provided for under Article 41 of the Convention - is an important issue (see, among other authorities, Shilbergs v. Russia, no. 20075/03, § 72, 17 December 2009).

• EGMR, 11.04.2024 - 42523/16

  NAGABAS AND KARPENKO v. UKRAINE

  The unlawfulness of the second applicant's detention was presumed because of the discontinuation of the criminal investigation for lack of the constituent elements of the crime (see and compare Lopushanskyy v. Ukraine [Committee], no. 27793/08, § 36, 2 February 2017).
• EGMR, 21.01.2021 - 21429/14

  DUBOVTSEV AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE

  It transpires that, since the criminal proceedings against the eleven applicants concerned were terminated on "exonerating" grounds, the Babushkinskyy District Court essentially presumed the unlawfulness of their prosecution and detention, and awarded them compensation in that connection (see, for a somewhat similar situation, Lopushanskyy v. Ukraine [Committee], no. 27793/08, § 36, 2 February 2017).