Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  POTOROC v. ROMANIA

  Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment;Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect) (englisch)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  POTOROC v. ROMANIA

  Art. 3 MRK
  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (5)Neu Zitiert selbst (3)

• EGMR, 06.04.2000 - 26772/95

  LABITA c. ITALIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 02.06.2020 - 37772/17

  It prohibits in absolute terms torture or inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment, irrespective of the circumstances and the victim's behaviour (see, for example, Labita v. Italy [GC], no. 26772/95, § 119, ECHR 2000-IV).
• EGMR, 22.05.2012 - 5826/03

  IDALOV c. RUSSIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 02.06.2020 - 37772/17

  The State must ensure that a person is detained in conditions which are compatible with respect for human dignity, that the manner and method of the execution of the measure of deprivation of liberty do not subject him to distress or hardship of an intensity exceeding the unavoidable level of suffering inherent in detention (see Svinarenko and Slyadnev v. Russia [GC], nos. 32541/08 and 43441/08, § 116, ECHR 2014 (extracts)), and that, given the practical demands of imprisonment, his health and well-being are adequately secured (see Idalov v. Russia [GC], no. 5826/03, § 93, 22 May 2012).
• EGMR - 43441/08 (anhängig)

  [ENG]

  Auszug aus EGMR, 02.06.2020 - 37772/17

  The State must ensure that a person is detained in conditions which are compatible with respect for human dignity, that the manner and method of the execution of the measure of deprivation of liberty do not subject him to distress or hardship of an intensity exceeding the unavoidable level of suffering inherent in detention (see Svinarenko and Slyadnev v. Russia [GC], nos. 32541/08 and 43441/08, § 116, ECHR 2014 (extracts)), and that, given the practical demands of imprisonment, his health and well-being are adequately secured (see Idalov v. Russia [GC], no. 5826/03, § 93, 22 May 2012).

• EGMR, 11.01.2024 - 45097/20

  LIBRI v. ITALY

  Specifically, the Court will take into account: (a) the prisoner's condition and the effect on the latter of the manner of his or her imprisonment, (b) the quality of care provided, and (c) whether or not the applicant should continue to be detained in view of his or her state of health (see Potoroc v. Romania, no. 37772/17, § 63, 2 June 2020, and Contrada v. Italy (no. 2), no. 7509/08, § 78, 11 February 2014).
• EGMR, 14.12.2023 - 1017/21

  AVIGNONE v. ITALY

  The Court has established clear and extensive case-law concerning complaints relating to medical care in prison (see, for example, Rooman v. Belgium ([GC], no. 18052/11, §§ 144-48, 31 January 2019; Potoroc v. Romania, no. 37772/17, §§ 63-65, 2 June 2020; and Contrada v. Italy (no. 2), no. 7509/08, § 78, 11 February 2014).
• EGMR, 09.11.2023 - 17378/20

  RIELA v. ITALY

  Specifically, the Court will take into account: (a) the prisoner's condition and the effect on the latter of the manner of his or her imprisonment, (b) the quality of care provided, and (c) whether or not the applicant should continue to be detained in view of his or her state of health (see Potoroc v. Romania, no. 37772/17, § 63, 2 June 2020, and Contrada v. Italy (no. 2), no. 7509/08, § 78, 11 February 2014).
• EGMR, 29.03.2022 - 48309/19

  LANIAUSKAS v. LITHUANIA

  The relevant general principles concerning the detention of persons who are seriously ill or persons with disabilities have been summarised in Enea v. Italy ([GC], no. 74912/01, §§ 55-59, ECHR 2009) and, more recently, in Potoroc v. Romania (no. 37772/17, §§ 61-65, 2 June 2020).
• EGMR, 02.11.2021 - 43393/18

  BUJOR c. ROUMANIE

  Les articles 589 § 1 a) et 592 du CPP régissant les demandes de suspension de l'exécution d'une peine pour raisons médicales sont présentés dans l'arrêt Potoroc c. Roumanie, (no 37772/17, § 44, 2 juin 2020).