Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 02.10.2012 - 44887/10 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2012,55806) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
TRUBIC v. CROATIA
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 13, Art. 35 MRK
Inadmissible (englisch)
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
[ENG]
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (3)
- EGMR, 27.10.1993 - 14448/88
DOMBO BEHEER B.V. v. THE NETHERLANDS
Auszug aus EGMR, 02.10.2012 - 44887/10
Most significantly for the present case, it is clear that the requirement of equality of arms, in the sense of a fair balance between the parties, applies in principle to such cases as well as to criminal cases (see Dombo Beheer B.V. v. the Netherlands, 27 October 1993, § 33, Series A no. 274). - EGMR, 12.07.1988 - 10862/84
SCHENK c. SUISSE
Auszug aus EGMR, 02.10.2012 - 44887/10
In particular, the Court is not competent to deal with an application alleging that errors of law or fact have been committed by the domestic courts, except when it considers that such error might have involved a possible violation of any of the rights and freedoms set out in the Convention (see Schenk v. Switzerland, 12 July 1988, § 45, Series A no. 140). - EGMR, 10.02.1983 - 7299/75
ALBERT ET LE COMPTE c. BELGIQUE
Auszug aus EGMR, 02.10.2012 - 44887/10
Thus, although these provisions have a certain relevance outside the strict confines of criminal law (see, mutatis mutandis, Albert and Le Compte v. Belgium, 10 February 1983, Series A no. 58, § 39), the Contracting States have greater latitude when dealing with civil cases concerning civil rights and obligations than they have when dealing with criminal cases (see Pitkänen v. Finland, no. 30508/96, § 59, 9 March 2004).