Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  VOYNOV v. RUSSIA

  Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for family life) (englisch)

Wird zitiert von ... (2)Neu Zitiert selbst (4)

• EGMR, 04.12.2015 - 47143/06

  EGMR verurteilt Russland wegen geheimer Telefonüberwachung

  Auszug aus EGMR, 03.07.2018 - 39747/10

  The provisions of Chapter 25 of the Russian Code of Civil Procedure ("CCP") (repealed as of 15 September 2015) were summarised, in particular, in Roman Zakharov v. Russia [GC], no. 47143/06, §§ 92-100, ECHR 2015).
• EGMR, 12.01.2016 - 37138/14

  Ungarns Anti-Terror-Gesetz ist menschenrechtswidrig

  Auszug aus EGMR, 03.07.2018 - 39747/10

  The Court is mindful of the fact that it has previously found on a number of occasions that Article 13 cannot be interpreted as requiring a remedy against the state of domestic law, as otherwise the Court would be imposing on Contracting States a requirement to incorporate the Convention into domestic law (see Appleby and Others v. the United Kingdom, no. 44306/98, § 56, ECHR 2003-VI; Ostrovar v. Moldova, no. 35207/03, § 113, 13 September 2005; I.G. and Others v. Slovakia, no. 15966/04, § 156, 13 November 2012; and Szabó and Vissy v. Hungary, no. 37138/14, § 93, 12 January 2016).
• EGMR, 30.06.2015 - 41418/04

  KHOROSHENKO c. RUSSIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 03.07.2018 - 39747/10

  The intensity of the interference will be serious if the Government do not allow the fulfilment of this right (on the protection of family life of prisoners in Russia, see the joint concurring opinion of Judges Pinto de Albuquerque and Turkovic in Khoroshenko v. Russia [GC], no. 41418/04, ECHR 2015).
• EGMR, 21.10.2010 - 25404/09

  GAFOROV v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 03.07.2018 - 39747/10

  The Court observes that it has on many occasions analysed the effectiveness of the mechanism set out in Chapter 25 of the CCP as a remedy in a variety of contexts, such as conditions of pre-trial detention (see Ananyev and Others, cited above, §§ 107-12), non-enforcement of final domestic judgments (see Burdov v. Russia (no. 2), no. 33509/04, § 103, ECHR 2009), and detention pending extradition (see Gaforov v. Russia, no. 25404/09, § 169, 21 October 2010).

• EGMR, 27.11.2018 - 14988/09

  Homosexuellen-Kundgebungen verboten: Russland erneut verurteilt

  Similarly, in the recent judgment in the case of Voynov v. Russia (no. 39747/10, 3 July 2018), which also concerned a repetitive case arising out of a structural problem - that is to say the placing of prisoners in detention facilities far from their family home - the Court made an award of non-pecuniary damage and costs as well as of expenses.
• EGMR, 04.06.2020 - 52526/17

  GOSAV ET AUTRES c. ROUMANIE

  Eu égard de ce qui précède et du lien étroit entre les articles 13 et 35 de la Convention (Rotaru c. Roumanie [GC], no 28341/95, § 40, CEDH 2000-V et, mutatis mutandis, Voynov c. Russie, no 39747/10, §§ 38-48, 3 juillet 2018) il convient de déclarer ce grief recevable et de constater la violation de l'article 13 de la Convention à raison de l'absence d'un recours effectif contre le refus des autorités pénitentiaires d'autoriser la sortie pour permettre au requérant d'assister aux funérailles de sa mère.