Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  CADIROGLU v. TURKEY

  Art. 2, Art. 2 Abs. 1 MRK
  No violation of Article 2 - Right to life (Article 2-1 - Life) (Substantive aspect) Violation of Article 2 - Right to life (Article 2-1 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect) ...

Sonstiges (2)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  Cadiroglu v. Turkey

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (8)

• EGMR, 14.03.2002 - 46477/99

  PAUL ET AUDREY EDWARDS c. ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EGMR, 03.09.2013 - 15762/10

  Whatever mode is employed to fulfil that purpose, the authorities must act of their own motion, once the matter has come to their attention, and they cannot leave it to the initiative of the victim's relatives (see Paul and Audrey Edwards v. the United Kingdom, no. 46477/99, § 69, ECHR 2002-II; Al Fayed, cited above, § 74).
• EGMR, 28.03.2000 - 22535/93

  MAHMUT KAYA v. TURKEY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 03.09.2013 - 15762/10

  There is also a requirement of promptness and reasonable expedition implicit in this context (see Çakıcı v. Turkey [GC], no. 23657/94, §§ 80, 87 and 106, ECHR 1999-IV, and Mahmut Kaya v. Turkey, no. 22535/93, §§ 106-07, ECHR 2000-III).
• EGMR, 22.09.1993 - 15473/89

  KLAAS c. ALLEMAGNE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 03.09.2013 - 15762/10

  Where domestic proceedings have taken place, it is not the Court's task to substitute its own assessment of the facts for that of the domestic courts, and as a general rule it is for those courts to assess the evidence before them (see Klaas v. Germany, 22 September 1993, § 29, Series A no. 269).

 
• EGMR, 04.05.2001 - 28883/95

  McKERR c. ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EGMR, 03.09.2013 - 15762/10

  As regards the assessment of evidence, the Court reiterates that its role is of a subsidiary nature, and that it must be cautious in taking on the role of a first instance tribunal of fact, where this is not rendered unavoidable by the circumstances of a particular case (see Ülkü Ekinci v. Turkey, no. 27602/95, § 142, 16 July 2002, and McKerr v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 28883/95, 4 April 2000).
• EGMR, 10.07.2001 - 25657/94

  AVSAR c. TURQUIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 03.09.2013 - 15762/10

  Nonetheless, where allegations are made under Articles 2 and 3 of the Convention the Court must apply particularly thorough scrutiny (see Avsar v. Turkey, no. 25657/94, § 283, ECHR 2001-VII) even if certain domestic proceedings and investigations have already taken place.
• EGMR, 08.07.1999 - 23763/94

  TANRIKULU c. TURQUIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 03.09.2013 - 15762/10

  The mere fact that the authorities were informed of the death will give rise ipso facto to an obligation under Article 2 of the Convention to carry out an effective investigation into the circumstances in which it occurred (see Tanrıkulu v. Turkey [GC], no. 23763/94, §§ 101 and 103, ECHR 1999-IV; Al Fayed v France (dec.), no. 38501/02, § 73, 27 September 2007).
• EGMR, 27.09.2007 - 38501/02

  AL FAYED c. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 03.09.2013 - 15762/10

  The mere fact that the authorities were informed of the death will give rise ipso facto to an obligation under Article 2 of the Convention to carry out an effective investigation into the circumstances in which it occurred (see Tanrıkulu v. Turkey [GC], no. 23763/94, §§ 101 and 103, ECHR 1999-IV; Al Fayed v France (dec.), no. 38501/02, § 73, 27 September 2007).
• EGMR, 16.07.2002 - 27602/95

  ULKU EKINCI v. TURKEY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 03.09.2013 - 15762/10

  As regards the assessment of evidence, the Court reiterates that its role is of a subsidiary nature, and that it must be cautious in taking on the role of a first instance tribunal of fact, where this is not rendered unavoidable by the circumstances of a particular case (see Ülkü Ekinci v. Turkey, no. 27602/95, § 142, 16 July 2002, and McKerr v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 28883/95, 4 April 2000).