Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 04.02.2014 - 70935/11 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2014,921) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
MONTEIRO AIRES v. PORTUGAL
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 13 MRK
Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings Article 6-1 - Reasonable time) Violation of Article 13 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy) (englisch)
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
Monteiro Aires v. Portugal
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (3)
- EGMR, 26.10.2000 - 30210/96
Das Recht auf Verfahrensbeschleunigung gemäß Art. 6 Abs. 1 S. 1 EMRK in …
Auszug aus EGMR, 04.02.2014 - 70935/11
As regards Article 13, the Court recalls that it guarantees an effective remedy before a national authority for an alleged breach of the requirement under Article 6 § 1 to hear a case within a reasonable time (see Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, § 156, ECHR 2000-XI). - EGMR, 17.09.2009 - 10249/03
Rückwirkende Strafschärfung und Anerkennung des Meistbegünstigungsprinzips als …
Auszug aus EGMR, 04.02.2014 - 70935/11
He relied on Articles 6 § 1, 13, 14, 17, 34, 41, 46 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1. Being master of the characterisation to be given in law to the facts of the case (see Phillips v. the United Kingdom, no. 41087/98, § 38, ECHR 2001-VII; and Scoppola v. Italy (no. 2) [GC], no. 10249/03, § 54, 17 September 2009), the Court considers that in the light of its case-law the applicant's complaints concerning the length of the proceedings should be examined from the standpoint of Articles 6 § 1 and 13 of the Convention only, which read as follows in the relevant parts:. - EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 30979/96
FRYDLENDER c. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 04.02.2014 - 70935/11
The Court recalls that the reasonableness of the length of proceedings must be assessed in the light of the circumstances of the case and with reference to the following criteria: the complexity of the case, the conduct of the applicant and the relevant authorities and what was at stake for the applicant in the dispute (see, among many other authorities, Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII).