Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  POLITICAL PARTY \

  Violation of Article 3 of Protocol No. 1 - Right to free elections-general (Article 3 of Protocol No. 1 - Free expression of the opinion of the people);Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed (Article 41 - Pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction);Non-pecuniary damage - ...

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  POLITICAL PARTY "PATRIA" v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA and 17 other applications

  Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 3 MRK
  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (2)Neu Zitiert selbst (3)

• EGMR, 06.05.2003 - 39343/98

  KLEYN AND OTHERS v. THE NETHERLANDS

  Auszug aus EGMR, 04.08.2020 - 5113/15

  For example, applicants who have not pursued a remedy that has already proved ineffective for other applicants in the same position can reasonably be exempted from doing so (see Davydov and Others v. Russia, no. 75947/11, § 233, 30 May 2017 and Kleyn and Others v. the Netherlands [GC], nos. 39343/98 and 3 others, § 156, ECHR 2003-VI).
• EGMR, 16.06.2015 - 48621/07

  DICLE ET SADAK c. TURQUIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 04.08.2020 - 5113/15

  In particular, the Court reiterates that, while the Contracting States enjoy a wide margin of appreciation in imposing conditions on the right to vote and to stand for election, it is for the Court to determine in the last resort whether the requirements of Article 3 of Protocol No. 1 have been complied with; it has to satisfy itself that the conditions do not curtail the rights in question to such an extent as to impair their very essence and deprive them of their effectiveness; that they meet the requirement of lawfulness; that they are imposed in pursuit of a legitimate aim; and that the means employed are not disproportionate or arbitrary (see Davydov and Others, cited above, § 272; see also Paksas, cited above, § 96-97; Tanase, cited above, §§ 161-62; and Dicle and Sadak v. Turkey, no. 48621/07, § 83, 16 June 2015).
• EGMR, 26.07.2011 - 4508/06

  ORUJOV v. AZERBAIJAN

  Auszug aus EGMR, 04.08.2020 - 5113/15

  Merits 32. The general principles regarding Article 3 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention, including the principles on conditions for the eligibility to stand for election, have been set out in, among other judgments, Davydov and Others v. Russia (cited above, §§ 271-77), Paksas v. Lithuania ([GC], no. 34932/04, § 96, ECHR 2011 (extracts)), Orujov v. Azerbaijan (no. 4508/06, §§ 40-42, 26 July 2011), Zdanoka v. Latvia ([GC], no. 58278/00, § 115, ECHR 2006-IV) and Tanase v. Moldova ([GC], no. 7/08, §§ 154-61, ECHR 2010).

• EGMR, 06.06.2023 - 8243/15

  PARTI POLITIQUE 'PATRIA' c. RÉPUBLIQUE DE MOLDOVA

  Informations fournies par le parti requérant avant la communication de la requête 4. Le contexte de l'affaire ainsi que les faits pertinents en l'espèce sont décrits en détail dans l'affaire Parti politique « Patria'et autres c. République de Moldova (nos 5113/15 et 14 autres, §§ 5-19, 4 août 2020).
• EGMR, 05.07.2022 - 21947/16

  LILIAN ERHAN v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA

  However, having regard to the facts of the case, the submissions of the parties and its findings under Article 6 of the Convention, the Court considers that it is not necessary to examine either the admissibility or the merits of the complaints under Article 8 (see Kaos-GL v. Turkey, 450 no. 4982/07, § 65, 22 November 2016; Ghiulfer Predescu v. Romania, 451 no. 29751/09, § 67, 27 June 2017; Political Party "Patria" and Others v. the Republic of Moldova, nos. 5113/15 and 14 others, § 41, 4 August 2020).