Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  VAN OFFEREN v. THE NETHERLANDS

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 2 MRK
  Inadmissible (englisch)

Wird zitiert von ... (6)Neu Zitiert selbst (4)

• EGMR, 27.02.1980 - 6903/75

  DEWEER c. BELGIQUE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.07.2005 - 19581/04

  The Court reiterates that the presumption of innocence, guaranteed by this provision, will be violated if a judicial decision or a statement by a public official concerning a person charged with a criminal offence reflects an opinion that he is guilty before he has been proved guilty according to law (see Deweer v Belgium, judgment of 27 February 1980, Series A no. 35, § 56; and Minelli v. Switzerland, judgment of 25 March 1983, Series A no. 62, § 37).
• EGMR, 10.02.1995 - 15175/89

  ALLENET DE RIBEMONT c. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.07.2005 - 19581/04

  Furthermore, the scope of Article 6 § 2 is not limited to criminal proceedings that are pending (see Allenet de Ribemont v. France, judgment of 10 February 1995, Series A no. 308, § 35).
• EGMR, 25.03.1983 - 8660/79

  Minelli ./. Schweiz

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.07.2005 - 19581/04

  The Court reiterates that the presumption of innocence, guaranteed by this provision, will be violated if a judicial decision or a statement by a public official concerning a person charged with a criminal offence reflects an opinion that he is guilty before he has been proved guilty according to law (see Deweer v Belgium, judgment of 27 February 1980, Series A no. 35, § 56; and Minelli v. Switzerland, judgment of 25 March 1983, Series A no. 62, § 37).
• EGMR, 25.08.1993 - 13126/87

  SEKANINA c. AUTRICHE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.07.2005 - 19581/04

  In certain instances, the Court has also found this provision applicable to judicial decisions taken following an acquittal (see Sekanina v. Austria, judgment of 25 August 1993, Series A no. 266-A, § 22; Asan Rushiti v. Austria, no. 28389/95, § 27, 21 March 2000; and Lamanna v. Austria, no. 28923/95, 10 July 2001).).

• EGMR, 01.03.2007 - 30810/03

  GEERINGS v. THE NETHERLANDS

  L'affaire serait identique pour l'essentiel à l'affaire Van Offeren c. Pays-Bas (déc.), no 19581/04, 5 juillet 2005.

  Dans un certain nombre d'affaires la Cour s'est dite prête à considérer les procédures de confiscation consécutives à des condamnations comme faisant partie intégrante du processus d'infliction de la peine et comme échappant dès lors au champ d'application de l'article 6 § 2 (voir en particulier Phillips, précité, § 34, et Van Offeren c. Pays-Bas (déc.), no 19581/04, 5 juillet 2005).

• EGMR, 28.03.2017 - 33898/15

  VANNUCCI v. SAN MARINO

  The Court reiterates that in a number of cases it has treated confiscation proceedings following on from a conviction as part of the sentencing process and therefore as beyond the scope of Article 6 § 2 (see, mutatis mutandis, Phillips v. the United Kingdom, no. 41087/98, § 36, ECHR 2001-VII, and Van Offeren v. The Netherlands (dec.), no. 19581/04, ECHR 2005).
• EGMR - 59494/09 (anhängig)

  [ENG]

  Did Article 6 § 2 apply to the confiscation proceedings (see Phillips v. the United Kingdom, no. 41087/98, §§ 31-36, ECHR 2001-VII; Van Offeren v. the Netherlands (dec.), no. 19581/04, 5 July 2005; and Geerings v. the Netherlands, no. 30810/03, §§ 41-50, 1 March 2007)?.

 
• EGMR - 58671/12 (anhängig)

  KOLI v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Did Article 6 § 2 apply to the confiscation proceedings (see Phillips v. the United Kingdom, no. 41087/98, §§ 31-36, ECHR 2001-VII; Van Offeren v. the Netherlands (dec.), no. 19581/04, 5 July 2005; and Geerings v. the Netherlands, no. 30810/03, §§ 41-50, 1 March 2007)?.
• EGMR - 25092/12 (anhängig)

  GALE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Lord Phillips considered that this proposition was inconsistent with this Court's earlier cases of Phillips v. the United Kingdom, no. 41087/98, ECHR 2001-VII and Van Offeren v. The Netherlands (dec.), no. 19581/04, 5 July 2005 and could not properly be derived from Geerings.
• EGMR - 54241/12 (anhängig)

  BAGNALL v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Did Article 6 § 2 apply to the confiscation proceedings (see Phillips v. the United Kingdom, no. 41087/98, §§ 31-36, ECHR 2001-VII; Van Offeren v. the Netherlands (dec.), no. 19581/04, 5 July 2005; and Geerings v. the Netherlands, no. 30810/03, §§ 41-50, 1 March 2007)?.