Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 06.04.2004 - 68416/01 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2004,35976) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
STEEL AND MORRIS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 10, Art. 10 Abs. 1 MRK
Admissible (englisch)
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 22.10.2002 - 68416/01
- EGMR, 06.04.2004 - 68416/01
- EGMR, 15.02.2005 - 68416/01
- EGMR, 02.12.2011 - 68416/01
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (4)
- EGMR, 09.10.1979 - 6289/73
AIREY v. IRELAND
Auszug aus EGMR, 06.04.2004 - 68416/01
In contrast to the position in criminal proceedings (Article 6 § 3(c)), the Convention left Contracting States with a free choice of the means of ensuring effective civil access to court (the Government relied on Airey v. Ireland, judgment of 6 February 1981, Series A no. 32, § 26). - EKMR, 14.07.1987 - 10594/83
MUNRO c. ROYAUME-UNI
Auszug aus EGMR, 06.04.2004 - 68416/01
The Convention organs had considered the non-availability of legal aid in defamation cases under English law in six cases, and had never found it to breach Article 6 § 1 (see the Winer case, cited above; Munro v. the United Kingdom, no. 10594/83, Commission decision of 14 July 1987; H.S. and D.M. v. the United Kingdom, no. 21325/93, Commission decision of 5 May 1993; Stewart-Brady v. the United Kingdom, nos. 27436/95 and 28406/95, Commission decision of 2 July 1997; McVicar v. the United Kingdom, no. 46311/99, ECHR 2002; A. v. the United Kingdom, no. 35373/97, ECHR 2002). - EKMR, 02.07.1997 - 27436/95
STEWART-BRADY v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EGMR, 06.04.2004 - 68416/01
The Convention organs had considered the non-availability of legal aid in defamation cases under English law in six cases, and had never found it to breach Article 6 § 1 (see the Winer case, cited above; Munro v. the United Kingdom, no. 10594/83, Commission decision of 14 July 1987; H.S. and D.M. v. the United Kingdom, no. 21325/93, Commission decision of 5 May 1993; Stewart-Brady v. the United Kingdom, nos. 27436/95 and 28406/95, Commission decision of 2 July 1997; McVicar v. the United Kingdom, no. 46311/99, ECHR 2002; A. v. the United Kingdom, no. 35373/97, ECHR 2002). - EKMR, 05.05.1993 - 21325/93
H.S. AND D.M. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EGMR, 06.04.2004 - 68416/01
The Convention organs had considered the non-availability of legal aid in defamation cases under English law in six cases, and had never found it to breach Article 6 § 1 (see the Winer case, cited above; Munro v. the United Kingdom, no. 10594/83, Commission decision of 14 July 1987; H.S. and D.M. v. the United Kingdom, no. 21325/93, Commission decision of 5 May 1993; Stewart-Brady v. the United Kingdom, nos. 27436/95 and 28406/95, Commission decision of 2 July 1997; McVicar v. the United Kingdom, no. 46311/99, ECHR 2002; A. v. the United Kingdom, no. 35373/97, ECHR 2002).