Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  ATV PRIVATFERNSEH-GMBH v. AUSTRIA

  Inadmissible (englisch)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  ATV PRIVATFERNSEH-GMBH v. AUSTRIA - [Deutsche Übersetzung] Zusammenfassung durch das Österreichische Institut für Menschenrechte (ÖIM)

  [DEU] Inadmissible

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  ATV PRIVATFERNSEH-GMBH v. AUSTRIA

  Art. 10, Art. 10 Abs. 1 MRK
  [ENG]

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 06.10.2015 - 58842/09
• EGMR, 29.10.2015 - 58842/09

Papierfundstellen

• GRUR Int. 2016, 294

Wird zitiert von ... (4)Neu Zitiert selbst (5)

• EGMR, 26.06.2012 - 8276/07

  MUSA v. THE UNITED KINGDOM AND OTHER APPLICATIONS

  Auszug aus EGMR, 06.10.2015 - 58842/09

  Since then, the Supreme Court has decided in several cases on requests lodged under Article 363a of the Code of Criminal Proceedings as from 2008 onwards (for example the decision of 26 June 2008, 15 Os 41/08f; of 26 June 2008, 15 Os 25/08b; of 23 July 2008, 13 Os 162/07h; of 21 August 2008, 15 Os 30/08p; of 15 January 2009, 12 Os 180/08z; of 14 October 2009, 15 Os 171/08y; of 14 October 2009, 12 Os 106/09m).

  The Supreme Court further stated in its case-law that victims of crimes and private prosecutors (Privatankläger), as well as public prosecutors, are not entitled to this remedy (see, inter alia, the Supreme Court's decisions of 26 June 2008, 15 Os 41/08f and of 17 August 2010, 11 Os 121/09t).

• EGMR, 26.10.2000 - 30210/96

  Das Recht auf Verfahrensbeschleunigung gemäß Art. 6 Abs. 1 S. 1 EMRK in …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 06.10.2015 - 58842/09

  In this respect it reiterates that the object of the rule on exhaustion of domestic remedies is to allow the national authorities (primarily the judicial authorities) to address allegations that a Convention right has been violated and, where appropriate, to afford redress before those allegations are submitted to the Court (see Azinas v. Cyprus [GC], no. 56679/00, § 38, ECHR 2004-III and Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, § 152, ECHR 2000-XI).
• EGMR, 28.04.2004 - 56679/00

  AZINAS c. CHYPRE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 06.10.2015 - 58842/09

  In this respect it reiterates that the object of the rule on exhaustion of domestic remedies is to allow the national authorities (primarily the judicial authorities) to address allegations that a Convention right has been violated and, where appropriate, to afford redress before those allegations are submitted to the Court (see Azinas v. Cyprus [GC], no. 56679/00, § 38, ECHR 2004-III and Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, § 152, ECHR 2000-XI).
• EGMR, 11.09.2002 - 57220/00

  MIFSUD contre la FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 06.10.2015 - 58842/09

  Under Article 35 of the Convention, normal recourse should be had by an applicant to remedies that are available and sufficient to afford redress in respect of the breaches alleged (see Mifsud v. France (dec.) [GC], no. 57220/00, § 15, ECHR 2002-VIII with further references).
• EGMR, 09.05.2003 - 47863/99

  SOC v. CROATIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 06.10.2015 - 58842/09

  However, once this burden of proof has been discharged, it falls to the applicant to establish that the remedy advanced by the Government was in fact exhausted or was for some reason inadequate and ineffective in the particular circumstances of the case or that there existed special circumstances absolving him or her from the requirement (see, inter alia, Soc v. Croatia, no. 47863/99, § 91, 9 May 2003).

• EGMR, 30.01.2024 - 37777/22

  GEMEINNÜTZIGE PRIVATSTIFTUNG ANAS SCHAKFEH v. AUSTRIA

  On 17 March 2022 the applicant foundation lodged a request for renewal of criminal proceedings under Article 363a of the CCP (see ATV Privatfernseh-GmbH v. Austria (dec.), no. 58842/09, § 32, 6 October 2015), arguing that the Higher Regional Court's decision violated its rights under Articles 6 § 2 and 13 of the Convention.
• EGMR, 09.11.2023 - 33024/19

  FIRTASH v. AUSTRIA

  On 17 August 2017 the applicant lodged a request for renewal of the criminal proceedings (Erneuerungsantrag) with the Supreme Court (Oberster Gerichtshof) under Article 363a of the Code of Criminal Procedure (Strafprozeβordnung; see ATV Privatfernseh-GmbH v. Austria (dec.), no. 58842/09, §§ 18-21, 6 October 2015).
• EGMR, 07.11.2023 - 31702/18

  G.L. AND L.G.P. v. AUSTRIA

  The applicants did not lodge a request for renewal of criminal proceedings (Antrag auf Erneuerung des Strafverfahrens) under Article 363a of the CCP (see ATV Privatfernseh-GmbH v. Austria (dec.), no. 58842/09, § 18, 6 October 2015) with the Supreme Court against the Appeal Court's decision.
• EGMR, 07.12.2017 - 43999/16
  In so far as relevant, the Supreme Court stated: "Given that Article 13 of the Convention requires a Contracting State to provide any person who shows with some plausibility that there has been a violation of his or her rights under the Convention and its Protocols with an effective remedy, in other words to ensure that there is a court at domestic level which examines questions of whether there has been a violation of Convention rights, Article 363a § 1 of the CCP must not be interpreted so as to allow an application for the renewal of criminal proceedings only in those cases where the European Court of Human Rights has already issued a judgment finding a violation of the Convention." For an extensive summary of the Supreme Court judgment, see ATV Privatfernseh-GmbH v. Austria ((dec.), no. 58842/09, § 19, 6 October 2015).