Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 06.12.2016 - 30623/13 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2016,59879) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
DESIRA AND ELTARHUNI v. MALTA
Inadmissible (englisch)
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
DESIRA AND ELTARHUNI v. MALTA
Art. 12 MRK
[ENG]
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (4)
- EGMR, 01.03.2010 - 46113/99
Demopoulos ./. Türkei und 7 andere
Auszug aus EGMR, 06.12.2016 - 30623/13
46113/99 et al, § 70, ECHR 2010; and Vuckovic and Others, cited above, § 77). - EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 22277/93
ILHAN c. TURQUIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 06.12.2016 - 30623/13
The Court must examine whether, in all the circumstances of the case, the applicant did everything that could reasonably be expected from him or her to exhaust domestic remedies (see Ilhan v. Turkey [GC], no. 22277/93, § 59, ECHR 2000-VII). - EGMR - 45886/07
[FRE]
Auszug aus EGMR, 06.12.2016 - 30623/13
The Court reiterates that States are dispensed from answering before an international body for their acts before they have had an opportunity to put matters right through their own legal system, and those who wish to invoke the supervisory jurisdiction of the Court as concerns complaints against a State are thus obliged to use first the remedies provided by the national legal system (see, among many authorities, Akdivar and Others v. Turkey, 16 September 1996, § 65, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996-IV; Vuckovic and Others v. Serbia [GC], nos. 17153/11 and 29 Others, § 70, 25 March 2014; and Mocanu and Others v. Romania [GC], nos. 10865/09, 45886/07 and 32431/08, § 221, ECHR 2014 (extracts)). - EGMR, 28.08.2012 - 17153/11
VUCKOVIC ET AUTRES c. SERBIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 06.12.2016 - 30623/13
The Court reiterates that States are dispensed from answering before an international body for their acts before they have had an opportunity to put matters right through their own legal system, and those who wish to invoke the supervisory jurisdiction of the Court as concerns complaints against a State are thus obliged to use first the remedies provided by the national legal system (see, among many authorities, Akdivar and Others v. Turkey, 16 September 1996, § 65, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996-IV; Vuckovic and Others v. Serbia [GC], nos. 17153/11 and 29 Others, § 70, 25 March 2014; and Mocanu and Others v. Romania [GC], nos. 10865/09, 45886/07 and 32431/08, § 221, ECHR 2014 (extracts)).