Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 07.10.2014 - 38717/13 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2014,32033) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
SKVORTSOV v. RUSSIA
Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 3, Art. 37, Art. 37 Abs. 1 MRK
Struck out of the list (englisch)
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (4)
- EGMR, 03.03.2009 - 28692/06
VOORHUIS v. THE NETHERLANDS
Auszug aus EGMR, 07.10.2014 - 38717/13
As regards the legal costs and expenses, referred to by the applicant, the Court notes that it has a discretion to award legal costs when it strikes out an application (see Rule 43 § 4 of the Rules of Court and, for example, M.C.E.A. Voorhuis v. the Netherlands (dec.), no. 28692/06, 3 March 2009; Shevanova v. Latvia (striking out) [GC], no. 58822/00, §§ 52-56, 7 December 2007; Sisojeva and Others v. Latvia [GC], no. 60654/00, §§ 130-133, ECHR 2007-I; and Meriakri v. Moldova (striking out), no. 53487/99, § 33, 1 March 2005).The Court reiterates that when making an award under Rule 43 § 4 of the Rules of Court, the general principles governing reimbursement of costs are essentially the same as under Article 41 of the Convention (see Pisano v. Italy (striking out) [GC], no. 36732/97, §§ 53-54, 24 October 2002, M.C.E.A. Voorhuis v. the Netherlands cited above, no. 28692/06, 3 March 2009 and Youssef v. the Netherlands (dec.), no. 11936/08, 27 September 2011).
- EGMR, 10.01.2012 - 42525/07
ANANYEV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 07.10.2014 - 38717/13
The Court notes at the outset that since its first judgment concerning the lengthy detention on remand in Russia (see Kalashnikov v. Russia, no. 47095/99, §§ 104-121 ECHR 2002-VI), it has found a violation of Article 5 § 3 of the Convention on account of an excessively lengthy detention on remand without proper justification in more than eighty cases against Russia (see Ananyev and Others v. Russia, nos. 42525/07 and 60800/08, § 200, 10 January 2012). - EGMR, 01.03.2005 - 53487/99
MERIAKRI v. MOLDOVA
Auszug aus EGMR, 07.10.2014 - 38717/13
As regards the legal costs and expenses, referred to by the applicant, the Court notes that it has a discretion to award legal costs when it strikes out an application (see Rule 43 § 4 of the Rules of Court and, for example, M.C.E.A. Voorhuis v. the Netherlands (dec.), no. 28692/06, 3 March 2009; Shevanova v. Latvia (striking out) [GC], no. 58822/00, §§ 52-56, 7 December 2007; Sisojeva and Others v. Latvia [GC], no. 60654/00, §§ 130-133, ECHR 2007-I; and Meriakri v. Moldova (striking out), no. 53487/99, § 33, 1 March 2005). - EGMR, 18.09.2007 - 28953/03
SULWINSKA v. POLAND
Auszug aus EGMR, 07.10.2014 - 38717/13
To this end, the Court will examine carefully the declaration submitted by the Government in the light of the principles established in its case-law, in particular the Tahsin Acar judgment (see Tahsin Acar v. Turkey [GC], no. 26307/95, §§ 75-77, ECHR 2003-VI; WAZA Spólka z o.o. v. Poland (dec.), no. 11602/02, 26 June 2007, and Sulwinska v. Poland (dec.), no. 28953/03, 18 September 2007).