Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  KRSTANOSKI AND OTHERS v. \

  Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Article 6-1 - Reasonable time) (englisch)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  KRSTANOSKI AND OTHERS v. "THE FORMER YUGOSLAV REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA" and 1 other application

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 MRK
  [ENG]

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 07.12.2017 - 38024/08, 54726/08
• EGMR, 05.09.2018 - 38024/08

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (7)

• EGMR, 18.05.2004 - 58148/00

  ÉDITIONS PLON c. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 07.12.2017 - 38024/08

  According to the Court's case-law, an applicant is entitled to the reimbursement of costs and expenses only in so far as it has been shown that those have been actually and necessarily incurred and are reasonable as to quantum (see Editions Plon v. France, no. 58148/00, § 64, ECHR 2004-IV).
• EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 30979/96

  FRYDLENDER c. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 07.12.2017 - 38024/08

  Having regard to the criteria laid down in its case-law for assessing the reasonable-time requirement contained in Article 6 § 1 of the Convention (see, among many other authorities, Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII; Comingersoll S.A. v. Portugal [GC], no. 35382/97, ECHR 2000-IV; and Philis v. Greece (no. 1), 27 August 1991, § 35, Series A no. 209), the Court considers that the length of both sets of proceedings was excessive and failed to meet the "reasonable-time" requirement.
• EGMR, 10.07.2002 - 39794/98

  GRATZINGER ET GRATZINGEROVA c. REPUBLIQUE TCHEQUE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 07.12.2017 - 38024/08

  Accordingly, this complaint under this head is incompatible ratione materiae with the provisions of the Convention within the meaning of Article 35 § 3 (a) and must be rejected in accordance with Article 35 § 4 (see, mutatis mutandis, Gratzinger and Gratzingerova v. the Czech Republic (dec.), no. 39794/98, § 75, ECHR 2002-VII).

 
• EGMR, 27.08.1991 - 12750/87

  PHILIS v. GREECE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 07.12.2017 - 38024/08

  Having regard to the criteria laid down in its case-law for assessing the reasonable-time requirement contained in Article 6 § 1 of the Convention (see, among many other authorities, Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII; Comingersoll S.A. v. Portugal [GC], no. 35382/97, ECHR 2000-IV; and Philis v. Greece (no. 1), 27 August 1991, § 35, Series A no. 209), the Court considers that the length of both sets of proceedings was excessive and failed to meet the "reasonable-time" requirement.
• EGMR, 06.04.2000 - 35382/97

  COMINGERSOLL S.A. v. PORTUGAL

  Auszug aus EGMR, 07.12.2017 - 38024/08

  Having regard to the criteria laid down in its case-law for assessing the reasonable-time requirement contained in Article 6 § 1 of the Convention (see, among many other authorities, Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII; Comingersoll S.A. v. Portugal [GC], no. 35382/97, ECHR 2000-IV; and Philis v. Greece (no. 1), 27 August 1991, § 35, Series A no. 209), the Court considers that the length of both sets of proceedings was excessive and failed to meet the "reasonable-time" requirement.
• EGMR, 23.10.2012 - 26852/09

  CERVENÁKOVÁ v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC

  Auszug aus EGMR, 07.12.2017 - 38024/08

  The Court reiterates that incomplete and therefore misleading information may amount to an abuse of the right of application, especially if such information concerns the very core of a case and no sufficient explanation is given for the failure to disclose that information (see Cervenáková v. Czech Republic (dec.), no. 26852/09, §§ 25-27, 23 October 2012, and Lukarev v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia (dec.), no. 3172/07, ECHR 15 January 2013).
• EGMR, 15.01.2013 - 3172/07

  LUKAREV v.

  Auszug aus EGMR, 07.12.2017 - 38024/08

  The Court reiterates that incomplete and therefore misleading information may amount to an abuse of the right of application, especially if such information concerns the very core of a case and no sufficient explanation is given for the failure to disclose that information (see Cervenáková v. Czech Republic (dec.), no. 26852/09, §§ 25-27, 23 October 2012, and Lukarev v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia (dec.), no. 3172/07, ECHR 15 January 2013).