Rechtsprechung
EGMR, 08.04.2010 - 45846/05 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2010,62146) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
GUTKA v. UKRAINE
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 13 MRK
Violation of Art. 6-1 Violation of Art. 13 (englisch)
Wird zitiert von ... Neu Zitiert selbst (2)
- EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 30979/96
FRYDLENDER c. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 08.04.2010 - 45846/05
The Court reiterates that the reasonableness of the length of proceedings must be assessed in the light of the circumstances of the case and with reference to the following criteria: the complexity of the case, the conduct of the applicant and the relevant authorities and what was at stake for the applicant in the dispute (see, among many other authorities, Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII). - EGMR, 28.05.2009 - 10792/04
NESTEROVA v. UKRAINE
Auszug aus EGMR, 08.04.2010 - 45846/05
The remainder of the Government's arguments concerning the parties' conduct does not exonerate the respondent State as it is the role of the domestic courts to manage their proceedings so that they are expeditious and effective (see, for example, Scordino v. Italy (no. 1) [GC], no. 36813/97, § 183, ECHR 2006-V and Nesterova v. Ukraine, no. 10792/04, § 43, 28 May 2009).
- EGMR, 26.07.2012 - 38711/06
SLYADNYEVA v. UKRAINE
The Court reiterates that it is the role of the domestic courts to manage the proceedings before them so that they are expeditious and effective (see Scordino v. Italy (no. 1) [GC], no. 36813/97, § 183, ECHR 2006-V; Pilipey v. Ukraine, no. 9025/03, § 31, 18 June 2009; Gutka v. Ukraine, no. 45846/05, §§ 27-28, 8 April 2010).