Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  VASILEVSKIY AND BOGDANOV v. RUSSIA

  Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-5 - Compensation);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction) (englisch)

Wird zitiert von ... (4)Neu Zitiert selbst (3)

• EGMR, 17.01.2012 - 36760/06

  STANEV c. BULGARIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 10.07.2018 - 52241/14

  The Court reiterates that the right to compensation under Article 5 § 5 of the Convention arises if a breach of one of its other four paragraphs has been established, directly or in substance, either by the Court or by the domestic courts (see, among many other authorities, Stanev v. Bulgaria [GC], no. 36760/06, § 182, ECHR 2012).
• EGMR, 26.05.2009 - 6773/02

  DAMIAN-BURUEANA ET DAMIAN c. ROUMANIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 10.07.2018 - 52241/14

  The Court reiterates that Article 5 § 5 does not set a particular level of compensation or refer to specific amounts (see Damian-Burueana and Damian v. Romania, no. 6773/02, § 89, 26 May 2009, and K.W. v. Switzerland, no. 26382/95, Commission decision of 3 December 1997).
• EKMR, 03.12.1997 - 26382/95

  K.W. v. SWITZERLAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 10.07.2018 - 52241/14

  The Court reiterates that Article 5 § 5 does not set a particular level of compensation or refer to specific amounts (see Damian-Burueana and Damian v. Romania, no. 6773/02, § 89, 26 May 2009, and K.W. v. Switzerland, no. 26382/95, Commission decision of 3 December 1997).

• EGMR, 11.04.2024 - 42523/16

  NAGABAS AND KARPENKO v. UKRAINE

  The Court reiterates that although Article 5 § 5 does not set a particular level of compensation or refer to specific amounts, the Convention in general is intended to guarantee not theoretical or illusory rights, but rights that are practical and effective (see Vasilevskiy and Bogdanov v. Russia, nos. 52241/14 and 74222/14, §§ 21-23, 10 July 2018 and further references therein).
• EGMR, 20.01.2022 - 29742/18

  MUSTAFAYEV AND SULEYMANOV v. AZERBAIJAN

  The Court has established clear and extensive case-law concerning complaints relating to the right to enforceable compensation for unlawful detention (see, for example, Vasilevskiy and Bogdanov v. Russia, nos. 52241/14 and 74222/14, 10 July 2018, and Norik Poghosyan v. Armenia, no. 63106/12, 22 October 2020).
• EGMR, 12.02.2019 - 10970/12

  GRIGORYEV AND IGAMBERDIYEVA v. RUSSIA

  It reiterates that such an assessment should be carried out in a manner consistent with the domestic legal requirements and take into account the standard of living in the country concerned, even if that results in awards of amounts that are lower than those fixed by the Court in similar cases (see Cocchiarella v. Italy [GC], no. 64886/01, § 80, ECHR 2006-V, and Vasilevskiy and Bogdanov v. Russia, nos. 52241/14 and 74222/14, § 23, 10 July 2018).
• EGMR, 11.05.2021 - 48729/16

  LINCAR v. ROMANIA

  52241/14 and 74222/14, §§ 22 and 23, 10 July 2018, and Mehmet Hasan Altan v. Turkey, no. 13237/17, § 175, 20 March 2018, with further references).