Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 11.02.2014 - 33529/11 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2014,1413) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
GÁBOR NAGY v. HUNGARY
Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 3, Art. 5 Abs. 4 MRK
Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-3 - Release pending trial Trial within a reasonable time) Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-4 - Review of lawfulness of detention) ...
Sonstiges (2)
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
Gábor Nagy v. Hungary
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
[ENG]
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (7)
- EGMR, 24.07.2003 - 46133/99
SMIRNOVA c. RUSSIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 11.02.2014 - 33529/11
The arguments for and against release must not be "general and abstract" (see Smirnova v. Russia, nos. 46133/99 and 48183/99, § 63, ECHR 2003-IX). - EGMR, 13.03.2007 - 23393/05
CASTRAVET v. MOLDOVA
Auszug aus EGMR, 11.02.2014 - 33529/11
The Court reiterates that Article 5 of the Convention is, together with Articles 2, 3 and 4, in the first rank of the fundamental rights that protect the physical security of an individual, and as such its importance is paramount (see Castravet v. Moldova, no. 23393/05, § 29, 13 March 2007). - EGMR, 26.10.2000 - 30210/96
Das Recht auf Verfahrensbeschleunigung gemäß Art. 6 Abs. 1 S. 1 EMRK in …
Auszug aus EGMR, 11.02.2014 - 33529/11
Continued detention can be justified in a given case only if there are specific indications of a genuine requirement of public interest which, notwithstanding the presumption of innocence, outweighs the rule of respect for individual liberty (see Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, § 110, ECHR 2000-XI).
- EGMR, 08.06.1995 - 16419/90
YAGCI AND SARGIN v. TURKEY
Auszug aus EGMR, 11.02.2014 - 33529/11
A person charged with an offence must always be released pending trial unless the State can show that there are "relevant and sufficient" reasons to justify the continued detention (see YaÄ?cı and Sargın v. Turkey, 8 June 1995, § 52, Series A no. 319-A). - EGMR, 12.05.1992 - 13770/88
MEGYERI c. ALLEMAGNE
Auszug aus EGMR, 11.02.2014 - 33529/11
Although it is not always necessary that the procedure under Article 5 § 4 be attended by the same guarantees as those required under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention for criminal or civil litigation (see Megyeri v. Germany, 12 May 1992, § 22, Series A no. 237-A), it must have a judicial character and provide guarantees appropriate to the kind of deprivation of liberty in question. - EGMR, 21.10.1986 - 9862/82
SANCHEZ-REISSE c. SUISSE
Auszug aus EGMR, 11.02.2014 - 33529/11
In the case of a person whose detention falls within the ambit of Article 5 § 1 (c), a hearing is required (see Nikolova v. Bulgaria (no. 2), no. 40896/98, § 58, 30 September 2004; Sanchez-Reisse v. Switzerland, 21 October 1986, § 51, Series A no. 107; and Kampanis v. Greece, 13 July 1995, § 47, Series A no. 318-B). - EGMR, 13.07.1995 - 17977/91
KAMPANIS v. GREECE
Auszug aus EGMR, 11.02.2014 - 33529/11
In the case of a person whose detention falls within the ambit of Article 5 § 1 (c), a hearing is required (see Nikolova v. Bulgaria (no. 2), no. 40896/98, § 58, 30 September 2004; Sanchez-Reisse v. Switzerland, 21 October 1986, § 51, Series A no. 107; and Kampanis v. Greece, 13 July 1995, § 47, Series A no. 318-B).