Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 11.07.2006 - 18221/03 |
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
BOGUNOVIC v. CROATIA
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 13 MRK
Partly inadmissible (englisch)
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 11.07.2006 - 18221/03
- EGMR, 24.05.2007 - 18221/03
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (4)
- EGMR, 01.03.2002 - 48778/99
KUTIC v. CROATIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 11.07.2006 - 18221/03
Relying on the Court's case-law (Kutic v. Croatia, no. 48778/99, ECHR 2002-II), it found violations of the applicant's constitutional rights to a hearing within a reasonable time and to access to a court.The Court recalls that it has held in similar cases that the applicants" complaints that they had been prevented from using any remedy in the proceedings concerning their actions for damages raised an issue of their right of access to a court under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention (see, for example, Kutic v. Croatia (dec.), no. 48778/99, 11 July 2000).
It also held that the applicants" length complaints were regarded as absorbed by complaints about lack of access to a court (see Kutic v. Croatia, no. 48778/99, § 34, ECHR 2002-II; and Multiplex v. Croatia, no. 58112/00, § 58, 10 July 2003).
Furthermore, the amount of compensation is insufficient and significantly lower than amounts awarded by the Court in similar cases (see Kutic v. Croatia, no. 48778/99, § 39, ECHR 2002-II).
- EGMR, 20.11.1995 - 17849/91
PRESSOS COMPANIA NAVIERA S.A. ET AUTRES c. BELGIQUE
Auszug aus EGMR, 11.07.2006 - 18221/03
He relies on Article 6 § 1 of the Convention, Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 thereto and the Court's case-law (Pressos Compania Naviera S.A. and Others v. Belgium, judgment of 20 November 1995, Series A no. 332). - EGMR, 10.07.2003 - 58112/00
MULTIPLEX v. CROATIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 11.07.2006 - 18221/03
It also held that the applicants" length complaints were regarded as absorbed by complaints about lack of access to a court (see Kutic v. Croatia, no. 48778/99, § 34, ECHR 2002-II; and Multiplex v. Croatia, no. 58112/00, § 58, 10 July 2003). - EGMR, 09.10.2003 - 61237/00
ACIMOVIC c. CROATIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 11.07.2006 - 18221/03
Therefore any reasons adduced to justify such measures have to be treated with the greatest possible degree of circumspection (see, for example, Scordino v. Italy (no. 1) [GC], no. 36813/97, § 126, to be published in ECHR 2006, and Acimovic v. Croatia, no. 61237/00, § 30, ECHR 2003-XI).