Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  VASSALLO v. MALTA

  Art. 41, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 Abs. 1 MRK
  Violation of P1-1 Remainder inadmissible Pecuniary damage - reserved (englisch)

Sonstiges (2)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  Vassallo v. Malta

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  [ENG]

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 11.10.2011 - 57862/09
• EGMR, 06.11.2012 - 57862/09

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (6)

• EGMR, 26.07.2001 - 51585/99

  HORVAT v. CROATIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.10.2011 - 57862/09

  Without prejudice to the effectiveness of an action under the Civil Code - an action of a general nature and in respect of which the Government have not produced any evidence in relation to its prospects of success (see, mutatis mutandis, Horvat v. Croatia, no. 51585/99, § 44, ECHR 2001-VIII, and Marini v. Albania, no. 3738/02, § 156, ECHR 2007-XIV (extracts)) - the Court considers that, in such cases, owners could not be expected to incur the expense and burden of instituting proceedings to ensure the authorities" fulfilment of their legal obligation (see, mutatis mutandis, Apostol v. Georgia, no. 40765/02, §§ 64-65, ECHR 2006-XI, in relation to enforcement proceedings).
• EGMR, 23.09.1982 - 7151/75

  SPORRONG ET LÖNNROTH c. SUÈDE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.10.2011 - 57862/09

  The Court reiterates that Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 guarantees, in substance, the right to property and comprises three distinct rules (see, for example, Sporrong and Lönnroth v. Sweden, 23 September 1982, § 61, Series A no. 52).
• EGMR, 05.05.1995 - 18465/91

  AIR CANADA c. ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.10.2011 - 57862/09

  They must be construed in the light of the general principle laid down in the first rule (see, for example, Air Canada v. the United Kingdom, 5 May 1995, §§ 29 and 30, Series A no. 316-A).

 
• EGMR, 27.11.2007 - 74258/01

  URBARSKA OBEC TRENCIANSKE BISKUPICE v. SLOVAKIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.10.2011 - 57862/09

  Legitimate objectives in the "public interest", such as those pursued in measures of economic reform or measures designed to achieve greater social justice, may call for less than reimbursement of the full market value (see Urbárska Obec Trencianske Biskupice v. Slovakia, no. 74258/01, § 115, ECHR 2007-... (extracts)).
• EGMR, 10.09.2014 - 37546/02

  KEÇECIOGLU AND OTHERS AGAINST TURKEY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.10.2011 - 57862/09

  A similar situation obtained in the cases of KeçecioÄ?lu and Others v. Turkey (no. 37546/02, §§ 28-29, 8 April 2008) and Motais de Narbonne v. France (no. 48161/99, § 19, 2 July 2002).
• EGMR, 03.11.2005 - 38244/03

  ABDILLA v. MALTA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.10.2011 - 57862/09

  Nevertheless, in the exercise of its power of review the Court must determine whether the requisite balance was maintained in a manner consonant with the individual's right of property (see Abdilla v. Malta (dec.), no 38244/03, 3 November 2005).