Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  MARCAN v. CROATIA

  Inadmissible (englisch)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  MARCAN v. CROATIA

  Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 MRK
  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ...Neu Zitiert selbst (4)

• EGMR, 12.07.2001 - 42527/98

  Enteignung eines Gemäldes in Tschechien auf Grund der Benes-Dekrete - …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 13.09.2016 - 67390/10

  By way of contrast, the hope of recognition of a property right which it has been impossible to exercise effectively cannot be considered a "possession" within the meaning of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1, nor can a conditional claim which lapses as a result of the non-fulfilment of the condition (see Prince Hans-Adam II of Liechtenstein v. Germany [GC], no. 42527/98, §§ 82-83, ECHR 2001-VIII; and Gratzinger and Gratzingerova v. the Czech Republic (dec.) [GC], no. 39794/98, § 69, ECHR 2002-VII).
• EGMR, 10.07.2002 - 39794/98

  GRATZINGER ET GRATZINGEROVA c. REPUBLIQUE TCHEQUE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 13.09.2016 - 67390/10

  By way of contrast, the hope of recognition of a property right which it has been impossible to exercise effectively cannot be considered a "possession" within the meaning of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1, nor can a conditional claim which lapses as a result of the non-fulfilment of the condition (see Prince Hans-Adam II of Liechtenstein v. Germany [GC], no. 42527/98, §§ 82-83, ECHR 2001-VIII; and Gratzinger and Gratzingerova v. the Czech Republic (dec.) [GC], no. 39794/98, § 69, ECHR 2002-VII).
• EGMR, 09.10.2003 - 48321/99

  SLIVENKO v. LATVIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 13.09.2016 - 67390/10

  "Possessions" can be existing possessions or assets, including claims by virtue of which the applicant can argue that he or she has at least a "legitimate expectation" of acquiring effective enjoyment of a property right (see, amongst many others, Slivenko and Others v. Latvia (dec.) [GC], no. 48321/99, § 121, ECHR 2002-II extracts; and Kopecký v. Slovakia [GC], no. 44912/98, § 35, ECHR 2004-IX).
• EGMR, 13.03.2012 - 23780/08

  MALIK v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 13.09.2016 - 67390/10

  The Court reiterates at the outset that Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 applies only to a person's existing possessions; it does not guarantee the right to acquire possessions (see Malik v. the United Kingdom, no. 23780/08, § 88, 13 March 2012).

• EGMR, 28.11.2023 - 46201/16

  ASSOCIATIONS DE COPROPRIÉTÉ FORESTIÈRE PORCENI PLESA ET PICIORUL BATRÂN BANCIU c. …

  Il s'ensuit que ce droit à dédommagement peut être qualifié de « bien'étant donné qu'il fait l'objet d'une créance certaine, ayant une base légale (paragraphes 18 et 21 ci-dessus), que son montant a été déterminé par les autorités administratives compétentes (paragraphes 10 et 14 ci-dessus) et qu'il n'a été contesté, ni quant à son existence, ni quant à son étendue, lors des procédures judiciaires internes relatives à la cause (voir, mutatis mutandis, Valeanu et autres c. Roumanie, nos 59012/17 et 27 autres, § 230, 8 novembre 2022, et, a contrario, Denisov c. Ukraine [GC], no 76639/11, § 137, 25 septembre 2018, et Marcan c. Croatie, (déc.), no 67390/10, §§ 32-42, 20 octobre 2016).